PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAFI vs. BUFM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAFI vs. BUFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF (TAFI) and AB Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAFI achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than BUFM's 3.85% return.


TAFI

1D
0.08%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.46%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
3.68%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFM

1D
0.12%
1M
2.20%
YTD
3.85%
6M
4.59%
1Y
13.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAFI vs. BUFM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TAFI
AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF
1.11%4.35%-0.45%
BUFM
AB Moderate Buffer ETF
3.85%12.94%-1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TAFI and BUFM is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAFI vs. BUFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAFI
TAFI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TAFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAFI Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TAFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFM
BUFM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BUFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAFI vs. BUFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF (TAFI) and AB Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAFIBUFMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.84

2.27

+0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.57

3.15

+1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.43

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.26

+0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.99

12.07

-0.08

TAFI vs. BUFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAFI Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the BUFM Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAFI and BUFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAFIBUFMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

2.27

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.72

1.13

+0.58

Drawdowns

TAFI vs. BUFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAFI drawdown since its inception was -2.00%, smaller than the maximum BUFM drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAFI and BUFM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAFIBUFMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.00%

-9.43%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.21%

-4.07%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

0.00%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.38%

-0.99%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

1.10%

-0.76%

Volatility

TAFI vs. BUFM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF (TAFI) is 0.46%, while AB Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFM) has a volatility of 1.04%. This indicates that TAFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAFIBUFMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

1.04%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.95%

4.37%

-3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47%

5.77%

-4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.98%

9.44%

-7.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.98%

9.44%

-7.46%

TAFI vs. BUFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAFI has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFM's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAFI vs. BUFM - Dividend Comparison

TAFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, while BUFM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUFM
AB Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TAFI
AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF
3.15%3.21%3.34%3.27%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAFI and BUFM have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFM has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to TAFI (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAFI dropped -2.00% vs BUFM's -9.43%.

On 1-year performance, BUFM leads with 13.06% vs 4.14% for TAFI. On fees, TAFI is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, TAFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUFM has performed better with a 13.06% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TAFI is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BUFM.

TAFI has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.00% for BUFM.

TAFI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BUFM is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for TAFI and 0.69% for BUFM.

TAFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAFI and BUFM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer