PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFM vs. HYFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFM vs. HYFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFM) and AB High Yield ETF (HYFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFM achieves a 3.88% return, which is significantly higher than HYFI's 1.98% return.


BUFM

1D
0.16%
1M
2.09%
YTD
3.88%
6M
4.30%
1Y
12.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYFI

1D
0.03%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.98%
6M
2.35%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
9.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFM vs. HYFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BUFM
AB Moderate Buffer ETF
3.88%12.94%-1.10%
HYFI
AB High Yield ETF
1.98%8.91%-0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFM and HYFI is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024

0.59

The correlation between BUFM and HYFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFM vs. HYFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFM
BUFM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BUFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

HYFI
HYFI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
HYFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HYFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYFI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFM vs. HYFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFM) and AB High Yield ETF (HYFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BUFMHYFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.37

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

3.08

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.59

13.91

-2.32

BUFM vs. HYFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFM Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the HYFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFM and HYFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFMHYFIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

1.95

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

1.70

-0.57

Drawdowns

BUFM vs. HYFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFM drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, which is greater than HYFI's maximum drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFM and HYFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFMHYFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-6.34%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

-2.49%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.21%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-0.51%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.55%

+0.55%

Volatility

BUFM vs. HYFI - Volatility Comparison

AB Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFM) and AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) have volatilities of 1.03% and 1.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFMHYFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

1.08%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.37%

3.10%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.77%

3.94%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.42%

5.36%

+4.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.42%

5.36%

+4.06%

BUFM vs. HYFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFM has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than HYFI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFM vs. HYFI - Dividend Comparison

BUFM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BUFM
AB Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYFI
AB High Yield ETF
6.64%6.66%6.57%4.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFM and HYFI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYFI has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to BUFM (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFM dropped -9.43% vs HYFI's -6.34%.

On 1-year performance, BUFM leads with 12.70% vs 7.65% for HYFI. On fees, HYFI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUFM has performed better with a 12.70% return vs 7.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYFI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BUFM.

HYFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 0.00% for BUFM.

BUFM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while HYFI is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for BUFM and 0.40% for HYFI.

BUFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFM and HYFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer