TACN vs. BDBT

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

TACN (T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF) and BDBT (Bluemonte Core Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TACN is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while BDBT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Bluemonte. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TACN charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BDBT.

Performance

TACN vs. BDBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN) and Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TACN achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly higher than BDBT's 0.10% return.

TACN

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 2.67%
• 6M: 8.65%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDBT

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.13%
• 6M: 0.06%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 1Y: 3.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TACN vs. BDBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF	10.93%	1.68%
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	0.10%	0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between TACN and BDBT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

TACN vs. BDBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TACN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BDBT

BDBT Risk / Return Rank: 29
BDBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
BDBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
BDBT Omega Ratio Rank: 27
BDBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
BDBT Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TACN vs. BDBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN) and Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TACN	BDBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.90	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.32	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.16	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.20	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.32	—

Drawdowns

TACN vs. BDBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TACN drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, which is greater than BDBT's maximum drawdown of -2.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACN and BDBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TACN	BDBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.98%	-2.88%	-8.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	-1.70%	+0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.42%	-0.77%	-1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TACN	BDBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.59%	3.87%	+13.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.59%	3.87%	+13.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.59%	3.87%	+13.72%

TACN vs. BDBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TACN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BDBT's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TACN vs. BDBT - Dividend Comparison

TACN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%.

Position	TTM	2025
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	3.87%	2.21%
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TACN and BDBT in my portfolio?

TACN and BDBT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TACN or BDBT?

On fees, TACN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TACN or BDBT?

TACN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BDBT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TACN or BDBT?

BDBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 0.00% for TACN.

What is the main difference between TACN and BDBT?

TACN is categorized as Actively Managed, while BDBT is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TACN and 0.23% for BDBT.