TACK vs. THIR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TACK (Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund) and THIR (THOR Index Rotation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. TACK is actively managed, while THIR is passively managed. Over the past year, TACK returned 14.23% vs 16.72% for THIR. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TACK charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for THIR.

Performance

TACK vs. THIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) and THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TACK achieves a 7.34% return, which is significantly higher than THIR's 5.56% return.

TACK

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 0.55%
• 6M: 5.03%
• YTD: 7.34%
• 1Y: 14.23%
• 3Y*: 11.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.07%

THIR

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -0.58%
• 6M: 3.00%
• YTD: 5.56%
• 1Y: 16.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund	$1.48M	$877.08K	$738.42K
THIR THOR Index Rotation ETF	$721.02K	$1.78M	$1.83M

TACK vs. THIR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund	7.34%	10.93%	-1.60%
THIR THOR Index Rotation ETF	5.56%	25.22%	3.16%

Correlation

The correlation between TACK and THIR is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024	0.63

The correlation between TACK and THIR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

TACK vs. THIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TACK	THIR
Healthcare	13.3%	8.7%
Real Estate	12.8%	0.6%
Utilities	12.6%	1.2%
Technology	12.4%	38.1%
Consumer Defensive	12.4%	5.0%
Industrials	12.3%	9.9%
Energy	11.2%	1.8%
Basic Materials	10.6%	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	2.2%	10.2%
Communication Services	0.1%	9.5%
Financial Services	-	12.9%

Return for Risk

TACK vs. THIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TACK

TACK Risk / Return Rank: 60
TACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
TACK Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
TACK Martin Ratio Rank: 61

THIR

THIR Risk / Return Rank: 49
THIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
THIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
THIR Omega Ratio Rank: 48
THIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
THIR Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TACK vs. THIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) and THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TACK	THIR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.27	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	1.81	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.23	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	1.89	+0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.68	6.02	+1.66

TACK vs. THIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TACK Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the THIR Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TACK and THIR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TACK vs. THIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TACK drawdown since its inception was -14.49%, which is greater than THIR's maximum drawdown of -10.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACK and THIR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TACK	THIR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.49%	-10.05%	-4.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.85%	-8.88%	+3.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	-2.83%	+1.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.09%	-2.07%	-2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	2.78%	-0.92%

Volatility

TACK vs. THIR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) is 2.20%, while THOR Index Rotation ETF (THIR) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that TACK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TACK	THIR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.20%	4.22%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.30%	10.62%	-3.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.67%	13.20%	-3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.16%	13.29%	-2.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.16%	13.29%	-2.13%

TACK vs. THIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TACK has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than THIR's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

TACK vs. THIR - Dividend Comparison

TACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than THIR's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund	1.29%	1.18%	1.26%	1.29%	0.89%
THIR THOR Index Rotation ETF	0.33%	0.35%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TACK and THIR in my portfolio?

TACK and THIR have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TACK or THIR?

THIR has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to TACK (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TACK dropped -14.49% vs THIR's -10.05%.

Which ETF is better, TACK or THIR?

On 1-year performance, THIR leads with 16.72% vs 14.23% for TACK. On fees, THIR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, TACK has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TACK or THIR?

Over the 1-year period, THIR has performed better with a 16.72% return vs 14.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TACK or THIR?

THIR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for TACK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TACK or THIR?

TACK has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.33% for THIR.

What is the main difference between TACK and THIR?

They also come from different issuers: Fairlead and THOR. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TACK and 0.70% for THIR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TACK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.