PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TACK vs. SFTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TACK vs. SFTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) and Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TACK achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly lower than SFTX's 22.26% return.


TACK

1D
0.13%
1M
1.95%
YTD
4.86%
6M
5.12%
1Y
13.26%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
10Y*

SFTX

1D
-0.29%
1M
7.93%
YTD
22.26%
6M
24.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TACK vs. SFTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TACK and SFTX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.68

TACK vs. SFTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TACK
SFTX

Utilities

16.8%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

16.7%
3.7%

Energy

16.4%
8.0%

Industrials

16.1%
12.1%

Healthcare

16.1%
10.1%

Basic Materials

14.5%
8.6%

Communication Services

12.2%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
5.9%

Technology

1.1%
28.2%

Financial Services

-

16.2%

Real Estate

-

0.9%

Utilities

TACK
16.8%
SFTX
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

TACK
16.7%
SFTX
3.7%

Energy

TACK
16.4%
SFTX
8.0%

Industrials

TACK
16.1%
SFTX
12.1%

Healthcare

TACK
16.1%
SFTX
10.1%

Basic Materials

TACK
14.5%
SFTX
8.6%

Communication Services

TACK
12.2%
SFTX
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

TACK
2.3%
SFTX
5.9%

Technology

TACK
1.1%
SFTX
28.2%

Financial Services

TACK

-

SFTX
16.2%

Real Estate

TACK

-

SFTX
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TACK vs. SFTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TACK
TACK Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
TACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
TACK Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TACK Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

SFTX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TACK vs. SFTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) and Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TACKSFTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.16

TACK vs. SFTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TACKSFTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

2.57

-1.96

Drawdowns

TACK vs. SFTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TACK drawdown since its inception was -14.49%, which is greater than SFTX's maximum drawdown of -12.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACK and SFTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TACKSFTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.49%

-12.75%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-0.29%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-2.78%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

Volatility

TACK vs. SFTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TACKSFTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.46%

21.65%

-12.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.23%

21.65%

-10.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.23%

21.65%

-10.42%

TACK vs. SFTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TACK has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than SFTX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

TACK vs. SFTX - Dividend Comparison

TACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than SFTX's 0.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SFTX
Horizon International Managed Risk ETF
0.20%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TACK
Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund
1.21%1.18%1.26%1.29%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


TACK and SFTX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TACK is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TACK is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for SFTX.

TACK has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.20% for SFTX.

They also come from different issuers: Fairlead and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TACK and 0.82% for SFTX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TACK and SFTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer