TACK vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TACK (Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TACK is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Fairlead, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TACK returned 14.49% vs 2.91% for BAMU. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TACK charges 0.76%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

TACK vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TACK achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.18% return.

TACK

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 5.35%
• 6M: 4.68%
• 1Y: 14.49%
• 3Y*: 11.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 2.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TACK vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund	5.35%	10.93%	11.76%	9.89%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	3.21%	4.14%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TACK and BAMU is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023	0.01

Return for Risk

TACK vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TACK

TACK Risk / Return Rank: 45
TACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
TACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
TACK Omega Ratio Rank: 39
TACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
TACK Martin Ratio Rank: 48

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TACK vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TACK	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	5.01	-3.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	8.84	-6.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	2.43	-1.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	24.72	-22.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.77	97.90	-90.12

TACK vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TACK Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TACK and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TACK vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TACK drawdown since its inception was -14.49%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TACK and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	TACK	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.49%	-0.36%	-14.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.85%	-0.12%	-5.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	0.00%	-0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.19%	-0.02%	-4.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.87%	0.03%	+1.84%

Volatility

TACK vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that TACK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TACK	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	0.09%	+2.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.35%	0.40%	+6.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.70%	0.58%	+9.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.23%	0.87%	+10.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.23%	0.87%	+10.36%

TACK vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TACK has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

TACK vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

TACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than BAMU's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%	0.00%
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund	1.21%	1.18%	1.26%	1.29%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TACK and BAMU in my portfolio?

TACK and BAMU have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TACK or BAMU?

TACK has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TACK dropped -14.49% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, TACK or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, TACK leads with 14.49% vs 2.91% for BAMU. On fees, TACK is cheaper at 0.76% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TACK or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, TACK has performed better with a 14.49% return vs 2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TACK or BAMU?

TACK is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TACK or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.21% for TACK.

What is the main difference between TACK and BAMU?

TACK is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Fairlead and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for TACK and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.