PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAAFX vs. FCSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAAFX vs. FCSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Asset Allocation Intermediate Horizon (TAAFX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAAFX achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly lower than FCSRX's 6.55% return. Over the past 10 years, TAAFX has outperformed FCSRX with an annualized return of 6.84%, while FCSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.42% annualized return.


TAAFX

1D
0.89%
1M
-0.44%
6M
3.27%
YTD
4.45%
1Y
9.61%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*
6.84%
ALL TIME*
6.08%

FCSRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.77%
6M
2.98%
YTD
6.55%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
4.42%
ALL TIME*
2.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TAAFX vs. FCSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAAFX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Intermediate Horizon
4.45%11.52%10.43%13.02%-16.73%9.77%16.00%17.67%-5.08%11.73%
FCSRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C
6.55%9.27%4.75%3.60%-4.26%14.68%2.60%9.54%-5.03%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between TAAFX and FCSRX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between TAAFX and FCSRX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAAFX vs. FCSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TAAFX
TAAFX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TAAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TAAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FCSRX
FCSRX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FCSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TAAFX vs. FCSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Asset Allocation Intermediate Horizon (TAAFX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TAAFXFCSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.47

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

3.36

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.80

10.54

-4.74

TAAFX vs. FCSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the FCSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAAFX and FCSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TAAFX vs. FCSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAAFX drawdown since its inception was -22.69%, smaller than the maximum FCSRX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAAFX and FCSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAAFXFCSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.69%

-33.91%

+11.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

-3.50%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.94%

-5.85%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.62%

-13.22%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.69%

-20.02%

-2.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-2.33%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-5.07%

-2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

1.11%

+0.40%

Volatility

TAAFX vs. FCSRX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Asset Allocation Intermediate Horizon (TAAFX) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) at 1.62%. This indicates that TAAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAAFXFCSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

1.62%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.48%

3.78%

+2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.21%

4.88%

+3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.95%

6.90%

+3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.74%

6.71%

+7.03%

TAAFX vs. FCSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAAFX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSRX's 1.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAAFX vs. FCSRX - Dividend Comparison

TAAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.52%, more than FCSRX's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCSRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C
2.54%3.74%3.86%4.35%6.51%4.53%1.32%2.20%8.51%1.58%1.34%0.66%
TAAFX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Intermediate Horizon
19.52%20.89%6.34%2.37%10.56%9.94%8.85%6.69%6.60%1.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAAFX and FCSRX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAAFX has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to FCSRX (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAAFX dropped -22.69% vs FCSRX's -33.91%.

FCSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAAFX and FCSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer