PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
T3GB.L vs. SPXP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

T3GB.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist (T3GB.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, T3GB.L achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than SPXP.L's 10.10% return.


T3GB.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.14%
6M
0.68%
YTD
0.73%
1Y
3.20%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
1.45%
10Y*

SPXP.L

1D
-0.46%
1M
-0.34%
6M
9.72%
YTD
10.10%
1Y
-98.79%
3Y*
-74.34%
5Y*
-54.72%
10Y*
-27.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

T3GB.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
T3GB.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist
0.73%4.94%3.79%3.35%-4.53%-0.90%2.61%0.19%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.10%-98.90%27.58%20.06%-8.79%31.26%13.90%6.99%

Correlation

The correlation between T3GB.L and SPXP.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

-0.17

The correlation between T3GB.L and SPXP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (all time) to -0.02 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

T3GB.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

T3GB.L
T3GB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
T3GB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T3GB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
T3GB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
T3GB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
T3GB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXP.L
SPXP.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

T3GB.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist (T3GB.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


T3GB.LSPXP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

0.49

+1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

-1.00

+5.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.64

-1.23

+17.87

T3GB.L vs. SPXP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current T3GB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of T3GB.L and SPXP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

T3GB.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum T3GB.L drawdown since its inception was -6.48%, smaller than the maximum SPXP.L drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T3GB.L and SPXP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


T3GB.LSPXP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-99.07%

+92.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.72%

-99.07%

+98.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.91%

-99.07%

+98.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.38%

-99.07%

+92.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-98.92%

+98.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-8.68%

+7.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

80.35%

-80.16%

Volatility

T3GB.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist (T3GB.L) is 0.35%, while Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that T3GB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


T3GB.LSPXP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.35%

2.93%

-2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.87%

7.90%

-7.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20%

99.31%

-98.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.03%

46.56%

-44.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.81%

34.90%

-33.09%

T3GB.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

T3GB.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

T3GB.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison

T3GB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, while SPXP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
T3GB.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist
3.84%3.95%4.36%4.05%1.98%0.28%1.15%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


T3GB.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for T3GB.L.

T3GB.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. T3GB.L tracks Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Dist, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for T3GB.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for T3GB.L and SPXP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer