PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
T vs. IGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

T vs. IGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. (T) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -8.33% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 20.35% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 2.02%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 23.77% annualized return.


T

1D
2.57%
1M
-3.83%
6M
-5.16%
YTD
-8.33%
1Y
-14.60%
3Y*
23.91%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
2.02%

IGM

1D
-2.48%
1M
-3.54%
6M
19.15%
YTD
20.35%
1Y
37.02%
3Y*
31.90%
5Y*
18.50%
10Y*
23.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

T vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
T
AT&T Inc.
-8.33%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
20.35%26.76%36.99%60.68%-35.83%25.72%45.11%41.81%2.26%37.20%

Correlation

The correlation between T and IGM is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2001

0.33

The correlation between T and IGM shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

T vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

IGM
IGM Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

T vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIGMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.27

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

2.26

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.14

7.10

-8.24

T vs. IGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current T Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the IGM Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of T and IGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

T vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, roughly equal to the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and IGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.15%

-65.59%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.89%

-16.44%

-12.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.89%

-26.39%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.01%

-40.68%

+8.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

-40.68%

-1.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.66%

-9.12%

-13.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-15.19%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.80%

5.23%

+7.57%

Volatility

T vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison

AT&T Inc. (T) has a higher volatility of 10.04% compared to iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) at 8.90%. This indicates that T's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.04%

8.90%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.94%

19.74%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.65%

23.59%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.40%

26.23%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.91%

24.76%

-0.85%

Dividends

T vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison

T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than IGM's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
0.14%0.17%0.22%0.33%0.66%0.16%0.32%0.50%0.57%0.57%0.90%0.79%
T
AT&T Inc.
5.05%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


T and IGM have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (10.04%) compared to IGM (8.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs IGM's -65.59%.

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for T and IGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer