T vs. CRWD
T (AT&T Inc.) and CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while CRWD operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, T returned 7.38%/yr vs 24.18%/yr for CRWD. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
T vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 45.66% return.
T
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -12.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
CRWD
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 14.93%
- YTD
- 45.66%
- 6M
- 35.27%
- 1Y
- 42.07%
- 3Y*
- 64.60%
- 5Y*
- 24.18%
- 10Y*
- —
T vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | -2.96% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 25.25% |
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 45.66% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -21.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between T and CRWD is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019 | -0.03 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between T and CRWD has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.29, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Fundamentals
T:
$3.04
CRWD:
-$0.02
T:
1.35
CRWD:
34.09
T:
$125.65B
CRWD:
$5.09B
T:
$105.41B
CRWD:
$3.82B
T:
$54.70B
CRWD:
$246.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank
T
CRWD
T vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| T | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.19 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 1.13 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 2.57 | -3.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
T vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, smaller than the maximum CRWD drawdown of -67.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and CRWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.15% | -67.69% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.87% | -37.18% | +15.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.87% | -44.44% | +22.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -67.69% | +35.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.12% | -12.70% | -5.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -23.61% | +7.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.64% | 16.29% | -5.65% |
Volatility
T vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AT&T Inc. (T) is 8.21%, while CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a volatility of 18.47%. This indicates that T experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 18.47% | -10.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 37.66% | -19.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.13% | 45.48% | -23.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 50.78% | -26.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.73% | 56.07% | -32.34% |
Dividends
T vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison
T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, while CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.71% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
T vs. CRWD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
T and CRWD have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWD has higher volatility (18.47%) compared to T (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs CRWD's -67.69%.
CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for T and CRWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer