PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
T vs. CNI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

T vs. CNI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. (T) and Canadian National Railway Company (CNI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than CNI's 21.78% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed CNI with an annualized return of 3.33%, while CNI has yielded a comparatively higher 9.51% annualized return.


T

1D
2.52%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
-12.96%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
3.33%

CNI

1D
0.60%
1M
6.94%
YTD
21.78%
6M
22.98%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

T vs. CNI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
T
AT&T Inc.
-2.96%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%
CNI
Canadian National Railway Company
21.78%-0.10%-17.51%7.84%-1.86%13.70%23.66%24.26%-8.49%25.03%

Correlation

The correlation between T and CNI is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 1996

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between T and CNI has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

T:

$3.04

CNI:

CA$7.60

PE Ratio

T:

7.74

CNI:

21.89

PS Ratio

T:

1.35

CNI:

5.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

T:

$125.65B

CNI:

CA$17.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

T:

$105.41B

CNI:

CA$7.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

T:

$54.70B

CNI:

CA$8.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

T vs. CNI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

CNI
CNI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

T vs. CNI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and Canadian National Railway Company (CNI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TCNIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.14

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

1.13

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

2.08

-3.30

T vs. CNI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current T Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the CNI Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of T and CNI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

T vs. CNI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, which is greater than CNI's maximum drawdown of -46.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and CNI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TCNIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.15%

-46.66%

-17.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.87%

-14.15%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.87%

-29.14%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.01%

-29.14%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

-29.15%

-13.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.12%

-5.55%

-12.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.72%

-9.49%

-6.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.64%

7.68%

+2.96%

Volatility

T vs. CNI - Volatility Comparison

AT&T Inc. (T) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) at 4.12%. This indicates that T's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TCNIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.21%

4.12%

+4.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.80%

17.30%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.13%

21.90%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.01%

22.38%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.73%

22.67%

+1.06%

Dividends

T vs. CNI - Dividend Comparison

T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than CNI's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNI
Canadian National Railway Company
2.20%2.58%2.43%1.85%1.41%1.61%1.59%1.79%2.01%2.00%2.23%2.24%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.71%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

T vs. CNI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and Canadian National Railway Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
33.47B
4.39B
(T) Total Revenue
(CNI) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. T values in USD, CNI values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


T and CNI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to CNI (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs CNI's -46.66%.

CNI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for T and CNI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer