T vs. ABBV
T (AT&T Inc.) and ABBV (AbbVie Inc.) are both stocks. T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while ABBV operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, T returned 2.10%/yr vs 19.60%/yr for ABBV. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
T vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -7.04% return, which is significantly lower than ABBV's 13.52% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 2.10%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 19.60% annualized return.
T
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- -7.04%
- 1Y
- -13.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
ABBV
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 17.87%
- 6M
- 20.04%
- YTD
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 38.03%
- 3Y*
- 25.04%
- 5Y*
- 21.08%
- 10Y*
- 19.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.49%
T vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | -7.04% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 13.52% | 33.08% | 18.86% | -0.23% | 24.01% | 32.43% | 27.72% | 1.47% | -0.96% | 60.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between T and ABBV is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
T:
$152.52B
ABBV:
$447.67B
T:
$3.05
ABBV:
$2.05
T:
7.19
ABBV:
123.48
T:
1.25
ABBV:
7.15
T:
$125.65B
ABBV:
$62.82B
T:
$105.41B
ABBV:
$46.15B
T:
$54.70B
ABBV:
$17.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank
T
ABBV
T vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| T | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.27 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 2.21 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 4.89 | -5.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
T vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and ABBV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.15% | -45.09% | -19.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.89% | -17.32% | -11.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.89% | -20.74% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -21.92% | -10.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | -45.09% | +2.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.57% | -2.25% | -19.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.74% | -10.66% | -5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.94% | 7.80% | +5.14% |
Volatility
T vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AT&T Inc. (T) is 9.59%, while AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that T experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.59% | 10.69% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.91% | 19.21% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.72% | 26.01% | -2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 23.39% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 25.90% | -1.98% |
Dividends
T vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison
T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than ABBV's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 2.70% | 2.87% | 3.49% | 3.82% | 3.49% | 3.84% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 3.41% |
T AT&T Inc. | 6.58% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
T vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
T and ABBV have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABBV has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to T (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs ABBV's -45.09%.
ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for T and ABBV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer