PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYM vs. MRVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SYM vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Symbotic Inc (SYM) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYM achieves a -30.03% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 229.54% return.


SYM

1D
-2.80%
1M
-16.29%
YTD
-30.03%
6M
-32.23%
1Y
48.63%
3Y*
-3.92%
5Y*
33.12%
10Y*

MRVL

1D
-0.36%
1M
57.18%
YTD
229.54%
6M
231.70%
1Y
302.72%
3Y*
64.86%
5Y*
40.49%
10Y*
40.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYM vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SYM
Symbotic Inc
-30.03%150.95%-53.81%329.90%19.40%-3.38%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
229.54%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%119.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SYM and MRVL is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SYM:

$5.59B

MRVL:

$249.86B

EPS

SYM:

$0.09

MRVL:

$2.90

PE Ratio

SYM:

475.08

MRVL:

96.58

PS Ratio

SYM:

2.00

MRVL:

27.99

PB Ratio

SYM:

5.44

MRVL:

13.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

SYM:

$2.52B

MRVL:

$8.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SYM:

$501.51M

MRVL:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

SYM:

$16.80M

MRVL:

$4.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYM vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYM
SYM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYM Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYM vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symbotic Inc (SYM) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SYMMRVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.55

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

11.57

-10.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.71

26.42

-24.71

SYM vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYM Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 4.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYM and MRVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SYM vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYM drawdown since its inception was -72.46%, smaller than the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYM and MRVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYMMRVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.46%

-91.60%

+19.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.76%

-26.36%

-26.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.46%

-60.79%

-11.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.46%

-61.88%

-10.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.31%

-11.61%

-40.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.11%

-46.74%

+18.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.52%

11.52%

+17.00%

Volatility

SYM vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Symbotic Inc (SYM) is 19.63%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 40.61%. This indicates that SYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYMMRVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.63%

40.61%

-20.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.76%

55.42%

-10.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.71%

70.94%

+19.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.15%

61.82%

+42.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.53%

51.94%

+49.59%

Dividends

SYM vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

SYM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.09%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%
SYM
Symbotic Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SYM vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Symbotic Inc and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
676.48M
2.42B
(SYM) Total Revenue
(MRVL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SYM vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Symbotic Inc and Marvell Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
22.2%
52.2%
Portfolio components
SYM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Symbotic Inc reported a gross profit of 149.95M and revenue of 676.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.2%.

MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

SYM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Symbotic Inc reported an operating income of 6.09M and revenue of 676.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.9%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

SYM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Symbotic Inc reported a net income of 17.52M and revenue of 676.48M, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SYM and MRVL have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (40.61%) compared to SYM (19.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYM dropped -72.46% vs MRVL's -91.60%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.30 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYM and MRVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer