SYBZ.DE vs. XGVC.DE
SYBZ.DE (SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF) and XGVC.DE (Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF) are both Global Bonds funds - SYBZ.DE tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond while XGVC.DE tracks the FTSE ESG Select World Government Bond Developed Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SYBZ.DE returned 0.32%/yr vs -0.19%/yr for XGVC.DE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SYBZ.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XGVC.DE.
Performance
SYBZ.DE vs. XGVC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYBZ.DE achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than XGVC.DE's 0.30% return.
SYBZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 0.26%
- 3Y*
- 0.32%
- 5Y*
- -1.06%
- 10Y*
- —
XGVC.DE
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- -0.16%
- 1Y
- -1.01%
- 3Y*
- -0.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SYBZ.DE vs. XGVC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYBZ.DE SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.96% | -4.27% | 3.98% | 1.41% | -3.29% |
XGVC.DE Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF | 0.30% | -4.28% | 1.61% | 2.49% | -5.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYBZ.DE and XGVC.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SYBZ.DE and XGVC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYBZ.DE vs. XGVC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SYBZ.DE
XGVC.DE
SYBZ.DE vs. XGVC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBZ.DE) and Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGVC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SYBZ.DE | XGVC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.95 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | -0.51 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.07 | -0.95 | +1.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SYBZ.DE | XGVC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | -0.34 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.24 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
SYBZ.DE vs. XGVC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYBZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.33%, which is greater than XGVC.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBZ.DE and XGVC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYBZ.DE | XGVC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.33% | -15.47% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.33% | -2.66% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.58% | -7.10% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.83% | -12.39% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -10.81% | +3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 1.42% | -0.15% |
Volatility
SYBZ.DE vs. XGVC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBZ.DE) is 0.99%, while Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF (XGVC.DE) has a volatility of 1.54%. This indicates that SYBZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGVC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYBZ.DE | XGVC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 1.54% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.53% | 3.05% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.62% | 4.00% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.40% | 6.22% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.21% | 6.22% | -0.01% |
SYBZ.DE vs. XGVC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SYBZ.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XGVC.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SYBZ.DE vs. XGVC.DE - Dividend Comparison
SYBZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, while XGVC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYBZ.DE SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF | 2.68% | 2.96% | 2.51% | 1.86% | 1.38% | 0.98% | 1.40% | 1.41% | 0.70% |
XGVC.DE Xtrackers II ESG Global Government Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYBZ.DE and XGVC.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SYBZ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SYBZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XGVC.DE.
SYBZ.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond, while XGVC.DE tracks FTSE ESG Select World Government Bond Developed Markets. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SYBZ.DE and 0.20% for XGVC.DE.
Find the right allocation for SYBZ.DE and XGVC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer