PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYBQ.DE vs. IUS6.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYBQ.DE vs. IUS6.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBQ.DE) and iShares Euro Covered Bond UCITS ETF (IUS6.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYBQ.DE achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than IUS6.DE's 0.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SYBQ.DE has outperformed IUS6.DE with an annualized return of 1.36%, while IUS6.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.15% annualized return.


SYBQ.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.59%
6M
2.26%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
6.11%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*
1.36%

IUS6.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
0.04%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.23%
1Y
1.06%
3Y*
3.14%
5Y*
-0.93%
10Y*
-0.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYBQ.DE vs. IUS6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SYBQ.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
1.59%1.45%9.71%9.39%-10.87%6.77%-2.67%10.78%-2.02%-1.92%
IUS6.DE
iShares Euro Covered Bond UCITS ETF
0.30%2.11%2.85%5.72%-13.52%-2.13%1.63%2.67%-0.09%0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between SYBQ.DE and IUS6.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2014

0.18

The correlation between SYBQ.DE and IUS6.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYBQ.DE vs. IUS6.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYBQ.DE
SYBQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SYBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

IUS6.DE
IUS6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IUS6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUS6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUS6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IUS6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUS6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYBQ.DE vs. IUS6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBQ.DE) and iShares Euro Covered Bond UCITS ETF (IUS6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SYBQ.DEIUS6.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.05

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

0.35

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

0.97

+0.67

SYBQ.DE vs. IUS6.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the IUS6.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYBQ.DE and IUS6.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SYBQ.DEIUS6.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

0.30

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

-0.24

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

-0.05

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.32

-0.24

Drawdowns

SYBQ.DE vs. IUS6.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYBQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.32%, which is greater than IUS6.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBQ.DE and IUS6.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYBQ.DEIUS6.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.32%

-16.47%

-12.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-2.22%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.48%

-2.22%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.50%

-15.57%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.63%

-16.47%

-4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-6.35%

+5.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-3.71%

-5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

0.81%

+0.34%

Volatility

SYBQ.DE vs. IUS6.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.77% compared to iShares Euro Covered Bond UCITS ETF (IUS6.DE) at 0.97%. This indicates that SYBQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUS6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYBQ.DEIUS6.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

0.97%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.55%

2.14%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.75%

2.58%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.45%

3.84%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

3.17%

+14.41%

SYBQ.DE vs. IUS6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SYBQ.DE and IUS6.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SYBQ.DE vs. IUS6.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYBQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than IUS6.DE's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUS6.DE
iShares Euro Covered Bond UCITS ETF
2.16%2.03%1.51%0.90%0.29%0.26%0.35%0.47%0.60%0.64%0.97%0.62%
SYBQ.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.67%4.72%4.31%3.04%1.88%1.71%2.04%1.84%1.92%2.48%2.57%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYBQ.DE and IUS6.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SYBQ.DE and IUS6.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

SYBQ.DE tracks Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond 0-5, while IUS6.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Covered. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYBQ.DE and IUS6.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer