PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SYBQ.DE vs. IG35.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SYBQ.DE vs. IG35.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SYBQ.DE (SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and IG35.DE (iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - SYBQ.DE tracks the Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond 0-5 while IG35.DE tracks the Bloomberg MSCI December 2035 Maturity EUR Corporate ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SYBQ.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IG35.DE.

Performance

SYBQ.DE vs. IG35.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBQ.DE) and iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc) (IG35.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYBQ.DE achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than IG35.DE's 0.90% return.

SYBQ.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
0.70%
YTD
1.59%
6M
2.20%
1Y
1.90%
3Y*
6.11%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*
1.36%

IG35.DE

1D
0.25%
1M
1.23%
YTD
0.90%
6M
0.47%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYBQ.DE vs. IG35.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
SYBQ.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF		1.59%1.42%
IG35.DE
iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.90%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SYBQ.DE and IG35.DE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF

iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc)

Often compared with SYBQ.DE:
SYBQ.DE vs. ECR1.DESYBQ.DE vs. EXHE.DESYBQ.DE vs. SUA0.DESYBQ.DE vs. JER5.DESYBQ.DE vs. SPPS.DESYBQ.DE vs. XDEP.DESYBQ.DE vs. ECR3.DE
Often compared with IG35.DE:
IG35.DE vs. IBCS.DEIG35.DE vs. EUN5.DEIG35.DE vs. JREB.DEIG35.DE vs. PR1C.DEIG35.DE vs. COVR.DEIG35.DE vs. SYBD.DEIG35.DE vs. EFRN.DE

Return for Risk

SYBQ.DE vs. IG35.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SYBQ.DE
SYBQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SYBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
IG35.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYBQ.DE vs. IG35.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBQ.DE) and iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc) (IG35.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SYBQ.DEIG35.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.40

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.58

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SYBQ.DE vs. IG35.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SYBQ.DEIG35.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.11

-0.02

Drawdowns

SYBQ.DE vs. IG35.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYBQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.32%, which is greater than IG35.DE's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBQ.DE and IG35.DE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SYBQ.DEIG35.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.32%

-4.08%

-25.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.48%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.50%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.63%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-1.08%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-1.38%

-7.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

—

—

Volatility

SYBQ.DE vs. IG35.DE - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SYBQ.DEIG35.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.55%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.75%

5.22%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.45%

5.22%

+1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

5.22%

+12.36%

SYBQ.DE vs. IG35.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SYBQ.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IG35.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SYBQ.DE vs. IG35.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYBQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, while IG35.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IG35.DE
iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SYBQ.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF		4.67%4.72%4.31%3.04%1.88%1.71%2.04%1.84%1.92%2.48%2.57%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

SYBQ.DE and IG35.DE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IG35.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IG35.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SYBQ.DE.

SYBQ.DE tracks Bloomberg Sterling Corporate Bond 0-5, while IG35.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI December 2035 Maturity EUR Corporate ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SYBQ.DE and 0.12% for IG35.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYBQ.DE and IG35.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer