IG35.DE vs. COVR.DE
IG35.DE (iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc)) and COVR.DE (PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - IG35.DE tracks the Bloomberg MSCI December 2035 Maturity EUR Corporate ESG Screened Index while COVR.DE tracks the PIMCO Covered Bond. Both are passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IG35.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for COVR.DE.
Performance
IG35.DE vs. COVR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IG35.DE achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly higher than COVR.DE's -0.22% return.
IG35.DE
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COVR.DE
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- -0.48%
- 1Y
- 0.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.61%
- 5Y*
- -0.49%
- 10Y*
- 0.53%
IG35.DE vs. COVR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IG35.DE iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.90% | -0.54% |
COVR.DE PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist | -0.22% | -0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between IG35.DE and COVR.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IG35.DE vs. COVR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IG35.DE
COVR.DE
IG35.DE vs. COVR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc) (IG35.DE) and PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist (COVR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IG35.DE | COVR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.21 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
IG35.DE vs. COVR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IG35.DE drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum COVR.DE drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IG35.DE and COVR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IG35.DE | COVR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -16.36% | +12.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -4.21% | +3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -4.10% | +2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.00% | — |
Volatility
IG35.DE vs. COVR.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IG35.DE | COVR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.22% | 2.48% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.22% | 3.77% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.22% | 2.98% | +2.24% |
IG35.DE vs. COVR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IG35.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than COVR.DE's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
IG35.DE vs. COVR.DE - Dividend Comparison
IG35.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COVR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COVR.DE PIMCO Covered Bond UCITS ETF Dist | 2.49% | 2.43% | 1.66% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 1.20% | 0.78% | 0.57% | 0.74% | 0.86% |
IG35.DE iShares iBonds December 2035 Term EUR Corporate UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IG35.DE and COVR.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IG35.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IG35.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for COVR.DE.
IG35.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI December 2035 Maturity EUR Corporate ESG Screened Index, while COVR.DE tracks PIMCO Covered Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IG35.DE and 0.43% for COVR.DE.
Find the right allocation for IG35.DE and COVR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer