SYBM.DE vs. GASF.DE
SYBM.DE (SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF) and GASF.DE (Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - SYBM.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond while GASF.DE tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SYBM.DE returned 1.70%/yr vs 3.49%/yr for GASF.DE. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SYBM.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for GASF.DE.
Performance
SYBM.DE vs. GASF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYBM.DE achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly lower than GASF.DE's 7.80% return.
SYBM.DE
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 1Y
- 5.08%
- 3Y*
- 3.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.70%
- 10Y*
- 1.31%
GASF.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 8.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- —
SYBM.DE vs. GASF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYBM.DE SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF | 2.31% | 2.48% | 3.06% | 5.79% | -4.56% | -0.97% | -5.72% | 1.94% |
GASF.DE Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc | 7.80% | -6.82% | 10.85% | -2.28% | 0.91% | 16.54% | -0.76% | -8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYBM.DE and GASF.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYBM.DE vs. GASF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SYBM.DE
GASF.DE
SYBM.DE vs. GASF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SYBM.DE) and Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc (GASF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SYBM.DE | GASF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.30 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 2.53 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.93 | 7.67 | -3.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SYBM.DE vs. GASF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYBM.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, which is greater than GASF.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBM.DE and GASF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYBM.DE | GASF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -13.75% | -17.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.90% | -3.40% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.60% | -11.00% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.64% | -13.75% | +5.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.31% | -1.66% | -3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.12% | -6.05% | -11.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.29% | 1.12% | +0.17% |
Volatility
SYBM.DE vs. GASF.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SYBM.DE) is 0.96%, while Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc (GASF.DE) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that SYBM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GASF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYBM.DE | GASF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | 1.25% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.21% | 3.44% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.06% | 5.31% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.68% | 6.68% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.65% | 7.71% | -0.06% |
SYBM.DE vs. GASF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SYBM.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GASF.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
SYBM.DE vs. GASF.DE - Dividend Comparison
SYBM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than GASF.DE's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GASF.DE Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc | 1.99% | 2.36% | 2.35% | 2.63% | 2.73% | 2.40% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SYBM.DE SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF | 4.98% | 5.01% | 4.74% | 4.21% | 4.29% | 3.90% | 4.12% | 4.34% | 4.13% | 5.01% | 4.30% | 5.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYBM.DE and GASF.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GASF.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GASF.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SYBM.DE.
SYBM.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond, while GASF.DE tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for SYBM.DE and 0.24% for GASF.DE.
Find the right allocation for SYBM.DE and GASF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer