GASF.DE vs. CGB.DE

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

GASF.DE (Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc) and CGB.DE (Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - GASF.DE tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index while CGB.DE tracks the FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond 1-10 Years Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GASF.DE returned 3.52%/yr vs 3.09%/yr for CGB.DE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GASF.DE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CGB.DE.

Performance

GASF.DE vs. CGB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc (GASF.DE) and Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (CGB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GASF.DE having a 7.95% return and CGB.DE slightly higher at 8.16%.

GASF.DE

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 1.40%
• 6M: 6.61%
• YTD: 7.95%
• 1Y: 8.98%
• 3Y*: 5.09%
• 5Y*: 3.52%
• 10Y*: —

CGB.DE

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 1.57%
• 6M: 7.02%
• YTD: 8.16%
• 1Y: 9.96%
• 3Y*: 4.67%
• 5Y*: 3.09%
• 10Y*: 2.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GASF.DE vs. CGB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GASF.DE Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc	7.95%	-6.82%	10.85%	-2.28%	0.91%	16.54%	-0.76%	-8.22%
CGB.DE Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)	8.16%	-6.58%	9.93%	-2.82%	-0.10%	15.85%	-0.38%	1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GASF.DE and CGB.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019	0.86

The correlation between GASF.DE and CGB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GASF.DE vs. CGB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GASF.DE

GASF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 69
GASF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GASF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GASF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GASF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GASF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 60

CGB.DE

CGB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 69
CGB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
CGB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
CGB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 58
CGB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
CGB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GASF.DE vs. CGB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc (GASF.DE) and Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (CGB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GASF.DE	CGB.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.71	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	2.53	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.29	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	3.51	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.54	10.39	-1.85

GASF.DE vs. CGB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GASF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the CGB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GASF.DE and CGB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GASF.DE vs. CGB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GASF.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.75%, smaller than the maximum CGB.DE drawdown of -20.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GASF.DE and CGB.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	GASF.DE	CGB.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.75%	-20.06%	+6.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.40%	-2.83%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.00%	-11.08%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.75%	-13.94%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.53%	-0.79%	-0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.06%	-9.26%	+3.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.12%	0.96%	+0.16%

Volatility

GASF.DE vs. CGB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc (GASF.DE) is 1.48%, while Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (CGB.DE) has a volatility of 1.78%. This indicates that GASF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GASF.DE	CGB.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.48%	1.78%	-0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.45%	4.02%	-0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.35%	5.84%	-0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.68%	6.74%	-0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.71%	11.06%	-3.35%

GASF.DE vs. CGB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GASF.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than CGB.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GASF.DE vs. CGB.DE - Dividend Comparison

GASF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, which matches CGB.DE's 1.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CGB.DE Xtrackers II Harvest China Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)	1.99%	2.40%	2.37%	2.97%	4.40%	2.17%	2.15%	2.56%	0.72%	2.64%	0.38%
GASF.DE Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD Inc	1.98%	2.36%	2.35%	2.63%	2.73%	2.40%	1.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GASF.DE and CGB.DE in my portfolio?

GASF.DE and CGB.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GASF.DE or CGB.DE?

On fees, CGB.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GASF.DE or CGB.DE?

CGB.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for GASF.DE.

What is the main difference between GASF.DE and CGB.DE?

GASF.DE tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index, while CGB.DE tracks FTSE Chinese Government and Policy Bank Bond 1-10 Years Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for GASF.DE and 0.20% for CGB.DE.