PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYB5.DE vs. IBCC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYB5.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYB5.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYB5.DE achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly lower than IBCC.DE's 4.60% return.


SYB5.DE

1D
0.86%
1M
1.86%
6M
2.51%
YTD
3.56%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
1.12%
10Y*
0.47%

IBCC.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.63%
6M
3.63%
YTD
4.60%
1Y
5.34%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYB5.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SYB5.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.56%0.33%6.69%5.72%-10.68%5.60%-4.05%2.74%
IBCC.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.60%-7.23%11.42%1.23%7.25%8.42%-8.13%-8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SYB5.DE and IBCC.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019

0.11

The correlation between SYB5.DE and IBCC.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYB5.DE vs. IBCC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYB5.DE
SYB5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SYB5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYB5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYB5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SYB5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYB5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCC.DE
IBCC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IBCC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYB5.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYB5.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SYB5.DEIBCC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.16

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

1.64

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.39

3.74

+2.66

SYB5.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYB5.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the IBCC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYB5.DE and IBCC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SYB5.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYB5.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.72%, which is greater than IBCC.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYB5.DE and IBCC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYB5.DEIBCC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.72%

-16.17%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-3.24%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.43%

-11.59%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.56%

-11.69%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.88%

-5.33%

-4.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.58%

-7.97%

-5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

1.43%

-0.66%

Volatility

SYB5.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYB5.DE) is 1.36%, while iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) has a volatility of 1.78%. This indicates that SYB5.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYB5.DEIBCC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.78%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.50%

4.35%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.56%

6.24%

-1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.29%

7.57%

-1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.93%

8.41%

-1.48%

SYB5.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SYB5.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IBCC.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SYB5.DE vs. IBCC.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYB5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than IBCC.DE's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBCC.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.99%4.63%6.49%4.14%0.47%0.09%1.39%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SYB5.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-5 Year Gilt UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.54%3.52%2.66%1.30%0.19%0.12%0.48%0.57%0.40%0.54%0.94%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYB5.DE and IBCC.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBCC.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCC.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SYB5.DE.

SYB5.DE tracks Bloomberg Sterling 1-5 Year Aggregate Gilts Bond Index, while IBCC.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SYB5.DE and 0.07% for IBCC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYB5.DE and IBCC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer