IBCC.DE vs. XBO2.DE
IBCC.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XBO2.DE (Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Government Bonds funds - IBCC.DE tracks the ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index while XBO2.DE tracks the FTSE Eurozone BOT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBCC.DE returned 4.12%/yr vs 1.73%/yr for XBO2.DE. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. IBCC.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XBO2.DE.
Performance
IBCC.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCC.DE achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly higher than XBO2.DE's 0.65% return.
IBCC.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.08%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
XBO2.DE
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 1.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.73%
- 10Y*
- 0.71%
IBCC.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCC.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.60% | -7.23% | 11.42% | 1.23% | 7.25% | 8.42% | -8.13% | -8.71% |
XBO2.DE Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.65% | 2.42% | 3.53% | 3.03% | -0.64% | -0.60% | -0.22% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCC.DE and XBO2.DE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCC.DE vs. XBO2.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCC.DE
XBO2.DE
IBCC.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) and Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBO2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBCC.DE | XBO2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.59 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.74 | 4.40 | -0.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBCC.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCC.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, which is greater than XBO2.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCC.DE and XBO2.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCC.DE | XBO2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.17% | -3.92% | -12.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.24% | -1.12% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.59% | -1.12% | -10.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.69% | -1.31% | -10.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -3.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.33% | -0.58% | -4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.97% | -0.71% | -7.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | 0.41% | +1.02% |
Volatility
IBCC.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBCC.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBO2.DE) at 1.48%. This indicates that IBCC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBO2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBCC.DE | XBO2.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 1.48% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.35% | 2.61% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.24% | 3.29% | +2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 1.53% | +6.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.41% | 1.65% | +6.76% |
IBCC.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCC.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XBO2.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBCC.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Dividend Comparison
IBCC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, while XBO2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCC.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.99% | 4.63% | 6.49% | 4.14% | 0.47% | 0.09% | 1.39% | 1.22% |
XBO2.DE Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBCC.DE and XBO2.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBCC.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBCC.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XBO2.DE.
IBCC.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Short Bond Index, while XBO2.DE tracks FTSE Eurozone BOT Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBCC.DE and 0.15% for XBO2.DE.
Find the right allocation for IBCC.DE and XBO2.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer