PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRZ.DE vs. EDMJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRZ.DE vs. EDMJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRZ.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXRZ.DE achieves a 32.06% return, which is significantly higher than EDMJ.DE's 16.26% return.


SXRZ.DE

1D
-1.49%
1M
7.63%
YTD
32.06%
6M
30.08%
1Y
60.04%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
11.60%

EDMJ.DE

1D
-0.37%
1M
2.41%
YTD
16.26%
6M
16.83%
1Y
32.00%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRZ.DE vs. EDMJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SXRZ.DE
iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc)
32.06%15.71%13.83%17.70%-15.73%3.03%13.44%10.48%
EDMJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc
16.26%12.89%10.91%15.92%-13.20%9.60%5.87%12.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRZ.DE and EDMJ.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2019

0.92

The correlation between SXRZ.DE and EDMJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRZ.DE vs. EDMJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRZ.DE
SXRZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SXRZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

EDMJ.DE
EDMJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EDMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDMJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDMJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EDMJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDMJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRZ.DE vs. EDMJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRZ.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXRZ.DEEDMJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

2.92

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.83

9.83

+4.00

SXRZ.DE vs. EDMJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the EDMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRZ.DE and EDMJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXRZ.DEEDMJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.61

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.55

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.54

+0.04

Drawdowns

SXRZ.DE vs. EDMJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.90%, which is greater than EDMJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRZ.DE and EDMJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRZ.DEEDMJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.90%

-27.95%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.92%

-10.59%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.19%

-16.82%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.46%

-19.81%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-0.37%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.26%

-6.13%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

3.15%

+1.13%

Volatility

SXRZ.DE vs. EDMJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to iShares MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (EDMJ.DE) at 3.60%. This indicates that SXRZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDMJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRZ.DEEDMJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

3.60%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.37%

15.23%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.34%

19.21%

+4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.49%

16.61%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.77%

17.52%

+0.25%

SXRZ.DE vs. EDMJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRZ.DE has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than EDMJ.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SXRZ.DE vs. EDMJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXRZ.DE nor EDMJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXRZ.DE and EDMJ.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EDMJ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EDMJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for SXRZ.DE.

SXRZ.DE tracks Nikkei 225®, while EDMJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for SXRZ.DE and 0.15% for EDMJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRZ.DE and EDMJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer