SXRV.DE vs. CSPX.L
SXRV.DE (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SXRV.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while CSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SXRV.DE returned 21.19%/yr vs 14.87%/yr for CSPX.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SXRV.DE charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSPX.L.
Performance
SXRV.DE vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SXRV.DE is traded in EUR, while CSPX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSPX.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXRV.DE achieves a 18.32% return, which is significantly higher than CSPX.L's 10.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SXRV.DE has outperformed CSPX.L with an annualized return of 21.19%, while CSPX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.87% annualized return.
SXRV.DE
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 18.32%
- 6M
- 19.47%
- 1Y
- 36.52%
- 3Y*
- 23.37%
- 5Y*
- 17.72%
- 10Y*
- 21.19%
CSPX.L
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 11.30%
- 1Y
- 24.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 14.27%
- 10Y*
- 14.87%
SXRV.DE vs. CSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXRV.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 18.32% | 6.98% | 33.55% | 51.19% | -30.05% | 39.34% | 34.48% | 42.90% | 3.03% | 15.81% |
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.06% | 3.52% | 33.52% | 22.94% | -13.69% | 39.03% | 7.93% | 33.50% | -1.02% | 6.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXRV.DE and CSPX.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SXRV.DE and CSPX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXRV.DE vs. CSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXRV.DE
CSPX.L
SXRV.DE vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SXRV.DE | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.36 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 3.47 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.45 | 11.77 | -1.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SXRV.DE vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXRV.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.80%, roughly equal to the maximum CSPX.L drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRV.DE and CSPX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXRV.DE | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.80% | -33.40% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.03% | -7.09% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.69% | -22.56% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.33% | -22.56% | -8.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.33% | -33.40% | +2.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -1.74% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -4.11% | -2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 2.09% | +1.33% |
Volatility
SXRV.DE vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXRV.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 4.02%. This indicates that SXRV.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXRV.DE | CSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 4.02% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 9.09% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 12.75% | +3.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 16.00% | +3.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 16.64% | +3.02% |
SXRV.DE vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXRV.DE has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SXRV.DE vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXRV.DE nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SXRV.DE and CSPX.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSPX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SXRV.DE.
SXRV.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CSPX.L is S&P 500. SXRV.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while CSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for SXRV.DE and 0.07% for CSPX.L.
Find the right allocation for SXRV.DE and CSPX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer