PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRQ.DE vs. EAH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRQ.DE vs. EAH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRQ.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (EAH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXRQ.DE achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than EAH.DE's 1.55% return.


SXRQ.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
1.09%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.52%
1Y
1.79%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
-2.02%
10Y*
-0.12%

EAH.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.09%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.73%
1Y
0.28%
3Y*
1.13%
5Y*
-5.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRQ.DE vs. EAH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SXRQ.DE
iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
1.42%1.68%0.91%8.71%-19.90%-0.67%
EAH.DE
Amundi Euro Government Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc
1.55%-2.11%-0.57%8.84%-30.65%1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRQ.DE and EAH.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021

0.96

The correlation between SXRQ.DE and EAH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRQ.DE vs. EAH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRQ.DE
SXRQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SXRQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

EAH.DE
EAH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
EAH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
EAH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRQ.DE vs. EAH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRQ.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (EAH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SXRQ.DEEAH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.01

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

0.06

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

0.13

+0.99

SXRQ.DE vs. EAH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the EAH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRQ.DE and EAH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SXRQ.DE vs. EAH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum EAH.DE drawdown of -36.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRQ.DE and EAH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRQ.DEEAH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.28%

-36.30%

+13.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.09%

-4.72%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.44%

-7.80%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.93%

-36.30%

+13.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.57%

-28.52%

+15.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-25.33%

+19.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

2.11%

-0.51%

Volatility

SXRQ.DE vs. EAH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRQ.DE) is 1.27%, while Amundi Euro Government Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (EAH.DE) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that SXRQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRQ.DEEAH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

1.69%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.18%

5.31%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96%

6.50%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.39%

10.79%

-3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.97%

10.79%

-4.82%

SXRQ.DE vs. EAH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRQ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EAH.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXRQ.DE vs. EAH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXRQ.DE nor EAH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SXRQ.DE and EAH.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SXRQ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EAH.DE.

SXRQ.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 10, while EAH.DE tracks Solactive Euro Government Green Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXRQ.DE and 0.20% for EAH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRQ.DE and EAH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer