PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRM.DE vs. VUDP.F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRM.DE vs. VUDP.F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRM.DE) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing (VUDP.F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXRM.DE is traded in USD, while VUDP.F is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VUDP.F values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXRM.DE achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly higher than VUDP.F's -2.88% return.


SXRM.DE

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
-0.65%
6M
-0.41%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
2.71%
5Y*
-0.94%
10Y*
0.77%

VUDP.F

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
-2.88%
6M
-2.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRM.DE vs. VUDP.F - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SXRM.DE and VUDP.F is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRM.DE vs. VUDP.F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRM.DE
SXRM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SXRM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VUDP.F
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRM.DE vs. VUDP.F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRM.DE) and Vanguard U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Distributing (VUDP.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXRM.DEVUDP.FDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.93

SXRM.DE vs. VUDP.F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXRM.DEVUDP.FDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.00

+0.24

Drawdowns

SXRM.DE vs. VUDP.F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRM.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, which is greater than VUDP.F's maximum drawdown of -5.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRM.DE and VUDP.F.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRM.DEVUDP.FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.31%

-5.68%

-17.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.40%

-4.93%

-5.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-2.38%

-4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

Volatility

SXRM.DE vs. VUDP.F - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRM.DEVUDP.FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.64%

6.71%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.37%

6.71%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.30%

6.71%

-0.41%

SXRM.DE vs. VUDP.F - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRM.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VUDP.F's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXRM.DE vs. VUDP.F - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXRM.DE nor VUDP.F has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXRM.DE and VUDP.F have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRM.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRM.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VUDP.F.

SXRM.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year, while VUDP.F tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index Hedged in EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SXRM.DE and 0.10% for VUDP.F.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRM.DE and VUDP.F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer