PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRL.DE vs. CEMR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRL.DE vs. CEMR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRL.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXRL.DE is traded in USD, while CEMR.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CEMR.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXRL.DE achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly lower than CEMR.DE's 6.67% return. Over the past 10 years, SXRL.DE has underperformed CEMR.DE with an annualized return of 1.39%, while CEMR.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.61% annualized return.


SXRL.DE

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
-0.31%
6M
-0.10%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
3.72%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
1.39%

CEMR.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
2.21%
YTD
6.67%
6M
11.12%
1Y
19.53%
3Y*
23.50%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRL.DE vs. CEMR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXRL.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
-0.31%7.42%1.93%4.32%-9.34%-2.31%6.97%6.13%1.04%1.28%
CEMR.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF
6.65%43.57%13.15%16.35%-19.99%12.61%21.56%28.88%-14.93%27.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRL.DE and CEMR.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2015

-0.05

The correlation between SXRL.DE and CEMR.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRL.DE vs. CEMR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRL.DE
SXRL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SXRL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMR.DE
CEMR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CEMR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRL.DE vs. CEMR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRL.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXRL.DECEMR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

1.44

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

5.16

-1.04

SXRL.DE vs. CEMR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the CEMR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRL.DE and CEMR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXRL.DECEMR.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

1.03

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.53

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.63

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.56

-0.02

Drawdowns

SXRL.DE vs. CEMR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRL.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.09%, smaller than the maximum CEMR.DE drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRL.DE and CEMR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRL.DECEMR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.09%

-35.49%

+21.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.43%

-13.51%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.63%

-14.58%

+10.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.50%

-35.49%

+21.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.09%

-35.49%

+21.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-2.34%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-7.41%

+4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

3.77%

-2.99%

Volatility

SXRL.DE vs. CEMR.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRL.DE) is 1.11%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (CEMR.DE) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that SXRL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRL.DECEMR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

4.97%

-3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.17%

16.20%

-14.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94%

18.92%

-15.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.68%

19.09%

-14.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.84%

18.41%

-14.57%

SXRL.DE vs. CEMR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRL.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMR.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXRL.DE vs. CEMR.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXRL.DE nor CEMR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXRL.DE and CEMR.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRL.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRL.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMR.DE.

SXRL.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while CEMR.DE is Momentum. SXRL.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 3-7 Year, while CEMR.DE tracks MSCI Europe Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SXRL.DE and 0.25% for CEMR.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRL.DE and CEMR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer