PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRH.DE vs. REET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRH.DE vs. REET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SXRH.DE) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXRH.DE is traded in EUR, while REET is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the REET values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXRH.DE achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than REET's 11.58% return.


SXRH.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.62%
YTD
2.67%
6M
1.53%
1Y
2.26%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
5.69%
10Y*

REET

1D
1.02%
1M
0.46%
YTD
11.58%
6M
10.89%
1Y
12.77%
3Y*
6.85%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*
3.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRH.DE vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXRH.DE
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.67%-5.76%14.60%4.61%3.48%14.75%-3.13%10.57%4.53%-8.74%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
11.58%-4.84%9.42%6.97%-19.40%42.34%-17.86%27.23%-0.83%-3.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRH.DE and REET is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2017

0.20

The correlation between SXRH.DE and REET shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRH.DE vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRH.DE
SXRH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SXRH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

REET
REET Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRH.DE vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SXRH.DE) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXRH.DEREETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.21

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

1.72

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

5.11

-3.74

SXRH.DE vs. REET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the REET Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRH.DE and REET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXRH.DEREETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

1.12

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.23

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.33

+0.18

Drawdowns

SXRH.DE vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRH.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.17%, smaller than the maximum REET drawdown of -44.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRH.DE and REET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRH.DEREETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.17%

-44.24%

+31.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.74%

-7.44%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

-19.45%

+9.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.14%

-28.89%

+16.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-2.50%

-3.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-10.55%

+6.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

2.51%

-1.02%

Volatility

SXRH.DE vs. REET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SXRH.DE) is 3.06%, while iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that SXRH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRH.DEREETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

3.30%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.92%

8.35%

-3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.56%

11.49%

-4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.19%

15.92%

-7.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.46%

18.58%

-11.12%

SXRH.DE vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRH.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than REET's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXRH.DE vs. REET - Dividend Comparison

SXRH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than REET's 3.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
3.38%3.67%3.64%3.27%2.43%3.18%2.65%5.25%5.73%3.84%5.37%3.56%
SXRH.DE
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.13%6.14%9.84%8.76%0.72%0.78%4.65%6.24%2.28%0.77%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SXRH.DE and REET have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRH.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRH.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for REET.

SXRH.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while REET is REIT. SXRH.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond 0-5 Years, while REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SXRH.DE and 0.14% for REET.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRH.DE and REET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer