PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXR4.DE vs. HMUD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXR4.DE vs. HMUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR4.DE) and HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXR4.DE is traded in EUR, while HMUD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HMUD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXR4.DE achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than HMUD.L's 10.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SXR4.DE having a 14.76% annualized return and HMUD.L not far behind at 14.34%.


SXR4.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.53%
YTD
11.29%
6M
10.68%
1Y
25.15%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
14.32%
10Y*
14.76%

HMUD.L

1D
0.68%
1M
4.92%
YTD
10.22%
6M
9.50%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
14.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXR4.DE vs. HMUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXR4.DE
iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc)
11.29%4.62%32.33%23.44%-15.85%38.32%9.25%34.28%-1.46%6.54%
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
10.22%0.38%33.32%23.64%-15.28%36.89%10.77%33.43%-1.29%6.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SXR4.DE and HMUD.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2010

0.83

The correlation between SXR4.DE and HMUD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXR4.DE vs. HMUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXR4.DE
SXR4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SXR4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXR4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXR4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SXR4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXR4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

HMUD.L
HMUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXR4.DE vs. HMUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR4.DE) and HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXR4.DEHMUD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.32

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.86

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.92

9.83

+2.09

SXR4.DE vs. HMUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXR4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXR4.DE and HMUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXR4.DEHMUD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.70

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.83

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.86

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.91

-0.13

Drawdowns

SXR4.DE vs. HMUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXR4.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, roughly equal to the maximum HMUD.L drawdown of -33.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXR4.DE and HMUD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXR4.DEHMUD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.16%

-33.81%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.36%

-6.96%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.63%

-23.33%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.63%

-23.33%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.16%

-33.81%

-0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

0.00%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-4.38%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.03%

+0.08%

Volatility

SXR4.DE vs. HMUD.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR4.DE) and HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) have volatilities of 2.73% and 2.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXR4.DEHMUD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.83%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.68%

8.20%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.70%

11.71%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

16.07%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

16.77%

-0.54%

SXR4.DE vs. HMUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXR4.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HMUD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SXR4.DE vs. HMUD.L - Dividend Comparison

SXR4.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.91%0.95%0.82%0.97%1.07%0.78%1.11%1.22%1.45%1.24%1.43%1.43%
SXR4.DE
iShares MSCI USA UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SXR4.DE and HMUD.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXR4.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXR4.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HMUD.L.

SXR4.DE tracks MSCI USA, while HMUD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SXR4.DE and 0.30% for HMUD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXR4.DE and HMUD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer