PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXR1.DE vs. SGIL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXR1.DE vs. SGIL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGIL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXR1.DE is traded in EUR, while SGIL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SGIL.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXR1.DE achieves a 8.90% return, which is significantly higher than SGIL.L's 2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SXR1.DE has outperformed SGIL.L with an annualized return of 7.48%, while SGIL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.82% annualized return.


SXR1.DE

1D
-0.90%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
8.90%
6M
10.35%
1Y
13.62%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
7.48%

SGIL.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.16%
YTD
2.04%
6M
1.45%
1Y
2.23%
3Y*
0.52%
5Y*
-1.37%
10Y*
0.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXR1.DE vs. SGIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXR1.DE
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc)
8.90%7.00%11.91%2.20%-0.86%13.17%-2.98%21.74%-6.20%10.76%
SGIL.L
iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.06%-4.13%3.32%1.51%-17.06%10.99%2.53%11.18%0.31%-5.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SXR1.DE and SGIL.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2010

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXR1.DE vs. SGIL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXR1.DE
SXR1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SXR1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SGIL.L
SGIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SGIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SGIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXR1.DE vs. SGIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXR1.DESGIL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.07

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

0.87

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.64

1.59

+5.05

SXR1.DE vs. SGIL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXR1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the SGIL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXR1.DE and SGIL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXR1.DESGIL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

0.41

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

-0.15

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.10

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.35

-0.08

Drawdowns

SXR1.DE vs. SGIL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXR1.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.62%, which is greater than SGIL.L's maximum drawdown of -22.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXR1.DE and SGIL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXR1.DESGIL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.62%

-22.48%

-16.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.21%

-2.55%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.28%

-8.66%

-11.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.28%

-22.48%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.91%

-22.48%

-14.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-17.55%

+15.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.79%

-7.19%

-2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

1.40%

+0.71%

Volatility

SXR1.DE vs. SGIL.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGIL.L) at 1.30%. This indicates that SXR1.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGIL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXR1.DESGIL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

1.30%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

3.64%

+5.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

5.36%

+6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.73%

8.90%

+5.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

8.57%

+8.03%

SXR1.DE vs. SGIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SXR1.DE and SGIL.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXR1.DE vs. SGIL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXR1.DE nor SGIL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXR1.DE and SGIL.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXR1.DE and SGIL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

SXR1.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SGIL.L is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SXR1.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan, while SGIL.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXR1.DE and SGIL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer