PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXR1.DE vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXR1.DE vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXR1.DE is traded in EUR, while IVV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IVV values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXR1.DE achieves a 8.90% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SXR1.DE has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 7.48%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.04% annualized return.


SXR1.DE

1D
-0.90%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
8.90%
6M
10.35%
1Y
13.62%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
7.48%

IVV

1D
-1.84%
1M
2.46%
YTD
10.59%
6M
9.32%
1Y
25.02%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
14.63%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXR1.DE vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXR1.DE
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc)
8.90%7.00%11.91%2.20%-0.86%13.17%-2.98%21.74%-6.20%10.76%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.59%3.86%33.18%22.52%-13.09%38.39%8.64%34.03%-0.01%6.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SXR1.DE and IVV is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2010

0.48

The correlation between SXR1.DE and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (5 years) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXR1.DE vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXR1.DE
SXR1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SXR1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXR1.DE vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXR1.DEIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

3.41

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.64

12.92

-6.28

SXR1.DE vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXR1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXR1.DE and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXR1.DEIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

2.04

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.88

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.81

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.62

-0.35

Drawdowns

SXR1.DE vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXR1.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.62%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -49.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXR1.DE and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXR1.DEIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.62%

-49.91%

+11.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.21%

-7.36%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.28%

-23.85%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.28%

-23.85%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.91%

-33.40%

-3.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-1.98%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.79%

-7.85%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

1.94%

+0.17%

Volatility

SXR1.DE vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) have volatilities of 3.06% and 2.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXR1.DEIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

2.93%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

8.76%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

12.34%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.73%

16.78%

-2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

18.58%

-1.98%

SXR1.DE vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXR1.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXR1.DE vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

SXR1.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.09%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
SXR1.DE
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SXR1.DE and IVV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SXR1.DE.

SXR1.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. SXR1.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SXR1.DE and 0.03% for IVV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXR1.DE and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer