SXLY.L vs. ACWD.L
SXLY.L (SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF) and ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SXLY.L is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while ACWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SXLY.L returned 13.42%/yr vs 12.65%/yr for ACWD.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SXLY.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for ACWD.L.
Performance
SXLY.L vs. ACWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXLY.L achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than ACWD.L's 11.54% return. Over the past 10 years, SXLY.L has outperformed ACWD.L with an annualized return of 13.42%, while ACWD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.65% annualized return.
SXLY.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
ACWD.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 28.98%
- 3Y*
- 21.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
SXLY.L vs. ACWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLY.L SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF | -0.37% | 8.34% | 29.22% | 41.53% | -34.41% | 27.96% | 28.33% | 27.87% | 0.68% | 22.35% |
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 11.54% | 22.83% | 17.76% | 22.27% | -18.37% | 18.77% | 15.91% | 25.80% | -9.85% | 24.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLY.L and ACWD.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SXLY.L and ACWD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SXLY.L vs. ACWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLY.L
ACWD.L
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
SXLY.L
ACWD.L
Technology
SXLY.L
ACWD.L
Industrials
SXLY.L
ACWD.L
Basic Materials
SXLY.L
-
ACWD.L
Communication Services
SXLY.L
-
ACWD.L
Consumer Defensive
SXLY.L
-
ACWD.L
Energy
SXLY.L
-
ACWD.L
Financial Services
SXLY.L
-
ACWD.L
Healthcare
SXLY.L
-
ACWD.L
Real Estate
SXLY.L
-
ACWD.L
Utilities
SXLY.L
-
ACWD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLY.L vs. ACWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLY.L
ACWD.L
SXLY.L vs. ACWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLY.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLY.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.43 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 3.30 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | 13.80 | -11.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLY.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 2.30 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.73 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.80 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.73 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
SXLY.L vs. ACWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLY.L drawdown since its inception was -37.79%, which is greater than ACWD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLY.L and ACWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLY.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.79% | -33.64% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.06% | -8.73% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.31% | -16.51% | -8.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.79% | -26.18% | -11.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.79% | -33.64% | -4.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -0.69% | -3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -4.67% | -3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.95% | 2.10% | +2.85% |
Volatility
SXLY.L vs. ACWD.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLY.L) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) at 3.87%. This indicates that SXLY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLY.L | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 3.87% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.49% | 9.89% | +4.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.52% | 12.54% | +5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.52% | 15.58% | +6.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 15.85% | +5.25% |
SXLY.L vs. ACWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLY.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SXLY.L vs. ACWD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXLY.L nor ACWD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SXLY.L and ACWD.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXLY.L.
SXLY.L is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while ACWD.L is Global Equities. SXLY.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLY.L and 0.12% for ACWD.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLY.L and ACWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer