SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L
SXLU.L (SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF) and XLUS.L (Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Utilities Equities funds - SXLU.L tracks the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD while XLUS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SXLU.L returned 8.49%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for XLUS.L. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SXLU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLUS.L.
Performance
SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SXLU.L having a 1.45% return and XLUS.L slightly higher at 1.50%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SXLU.L having a 8.49% annualized return and XLUS.L not far behind at 8.46%.
SXLU.L
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- -6.82%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 8.59%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
XLUS.L
- 1D
- -2.16%
- 1M
- -6.92%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 8.54%
- 3Y*
- 12.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLU.L SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF | 1.45% | 15.70% | 22.97% | -8.14% | 2.07% | 18.45% | -1.27% | 25.13% | 2.96% | 10.96% |
XLUS.L Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 1.50% | 15.68% | 22.50% | -7.74% | 1.91% | 18.46% | -1.37% | 25.26% | 2.91% | 10.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLU.L and XLUS.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SXLU.L and XLUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLU.L
XLUS.L
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
SXLU.L
XLUS.L
Basic Materials
SXLU.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Communication Services
SXLU.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SXLU.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SXLU.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Energy
SXLU.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Financial Services
SXLU.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Healthcare
SXLU.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Industrials
SXLU.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Real Estate
SXLU.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Technology
SXLU.L
-
XLUS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLU.L
XLUS.L
SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) and Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLU.L | XLUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.11 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | 2.03 | -0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLU.L | XLUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 0.59 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.60 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLU.L drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, roughly equal to the maximum XLUS.L drawdown of -36.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLU.L and XLUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLU.L | XLUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.20% | -36.30% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -8.92% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.41% | -18.43% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | -26.24% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.20% | -36.30% | +0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.93% | -8.92% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -6.00% | -0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 4.19% | +0.03% |
Volatility
SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) and Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) have volatilities of 4.96% and 4.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLU.L | XLUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 4.95% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.51% | 11.66% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.25% | 14.41% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 17.03% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 18.06% | -0.05% |
SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLUS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXLU.L nor XLUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, SXLU.L and XLUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLUS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLUS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXLU.L.
SXLU.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while XLUS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLU.L and 0.14% for XLUS.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLU.L and XLUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer