PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) and Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SXLU.L having a 1.45% return and XLUS.L slightly higher at 1.50%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SXLU.L having a 8.49% annualized return and XLUS.L not far behind at 8.46%.


SXLU.L

1D
-2.18%
1M
-6.82%
YTD
1.45%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
8.59%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
8.49%

XLUS.L

1D
-2.16%
1M
-6.92%
YTD
1.50%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
8.54%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
8.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXLU.L
SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF
1.45%15.70%22.97%-8.14%2.07%18.45%-1.27%25.13%2.96%10.96%
XLUS.L
Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
1.50%15.68%22.50%-7.74%1.91%18.46%-1.37%25.26%2.91%10.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLU.L and XLUS.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015

0.99

The correlation between SXLU.L and XLUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SXLU.L
XLUS.L

Utilities

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

SXLU.L
100.0%
XLUS.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

SXLU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Communication Services

SXLU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SXLU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SXLU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Energy

SXLU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Financial Services

SXLU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Healthcare

SXLU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Industrials

SXLU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Real Estate

SXLU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Technology

SXLU.L

-

XLUS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLU.L
SXLU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SXLU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XLUS.L
XLUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) and Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXLU.LXLUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.11

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

0.95

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.03

2.03

-0.01

SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the XLUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLU.L and XLUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXLU.LXLUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

0.59

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.49

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.47

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.60

-0.07

Drawdowns

SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLU.L drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, roughly equal to the maximum XLUS.L drawdown of -36.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLU.L and XLUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXLU.LXLUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-36.30%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-8.92%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.41%

-18.43%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-26.24%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

-36.30%

+0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.93%

-8.92%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-6.00%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

4.19%

+0.03%

Volatility

SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) and Invesco Utilities S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLUS.L) have volatilities of 4.96% and 4.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXLU.LXLUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

4.95%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.51%

11.66%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

14.41%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

17.03%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

18.06%

-0.05%

SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLUS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXLU.L vs. XLUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLU.L nor XLUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, SXLU.L and XLUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XLUS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLUS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXLU.L.

SXLU.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while XLUS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Utilities Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLU.L and 0.14% for XLUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXLU.L and XLUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer