SXLU.L vs. XDWU.L
SXLU.L (SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF) and XDWU.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C) are both Utilities Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, from State Street and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SXLU.L returned 8.49%/yr vs 8.86%/yr for XDWU.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SXLU.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWU.L.
Performance
SXLU.L vs. XDWU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXLU.L achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than XDWU.L's 4.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SXLU.L having a 8.49% annualized return and XDWU.L not far ahead at 8.86%.
SXLU.L
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- -6.82%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 8.59%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
XDWU.L
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -5.78%
- YTD
- 4.59%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- 1Y
- 14.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
SXLU.L vs. XDWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLU.L SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF | 1.45% | 15.70% | 22.97% | -8.14% | 2.07% | 18.45% | -1.27% | 25.13% | 2.96% | 10.96% |
XDWU.L Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C | 4.59% | 26.14% | 12.54% | 0.30% | -3.57% | 10.23% | 4.86% | 24.37% | 0.63% | 15.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLU.L and XDWU.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2016 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SXLU.L and XDWU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SXLU.L vs. XDWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLU.L
XDWU.L
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
SXLU.L
XDWU.L
Basic Materials
SXLU.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Communication Services
SXLU.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SXLU.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SXLU.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Energy
SXLU.L
-
XDWU.L
Financial Services
SXLU.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Healthcare
SXLU.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Industrials
SXLU.L
-
XDWU.L
Real Estate
SXLU.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Technology
SXLU.L
-
XDWU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLU.L vs. XDWU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLU.L
XDWU.L
SXLU.L vs. XDWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLU.L | XDWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.20 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.84 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | 5.63 | -3.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLU.L | XDWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 1.19 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.59 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.64 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.63 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
SXLU.L vs. XDWU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLU.L drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, which is greater than XDWU.L's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLU.L and XDWU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLU.L | XDWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.20% | -33.87% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -8.05% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.41% | -17.56% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | -21.92% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.20% | -33.87% | -2.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.93% | -7.90% | -1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -5.47% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 2.64% | +1.58% |
Volatility
SXLU.L vs. XDWU.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) at 4.19%. This indicates that SXLU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLU.L | XDWU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 4.19% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.51% | 10.50% | +1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.25% | 12.48% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 15.27% | +1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 17.87% | +0.14% |
SXLU.L vs. XDWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SXLU.L vs. XDWU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXLU.L nor XDWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SXLU.L and XDWU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SXLU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWU.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLU.L and 0.25% for XDWU.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLU.L and XDWU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer