PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXLU.L vs. WTCH.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXLU.L vs. WTCH.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) and SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXLU.L is traded in USD, while WTCH.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WTCH.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXLU.L achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than WTCH.AS's 24.02% return. Over the past 10 years, SXLU.L has underperformed WTCH.AS with an annualized return of 8.49%, while WTCH.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 24.26% annualized return.


SXLU.L

1D
-2.18%
1M
-6.82%
YTD
1.45%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
8.59%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
8.49%

WTCH.AS

1D
-1.83%
1M
14.05%
YTD
24.02%
6M
23.60%
1Y
51.21%
3Y*
32.78%
5Y*
21.35%
10Y*
24.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLU.L vs. WTCH.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXLU.L
SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF
1.45%15.70%22.97%-8.14%2.07%18.45%-1.27%25.13%2.96%10.96%
WTCH.AS
SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF
24.02%22.97%34.52%53.80%-32.01%31.28%43.46%46.53%-2.84%38.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLU.L and WTCH.AS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016

0.17

The correlation between SXLU.L and WTCH.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (3 years) to 0.17 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXLU.L vs. WTCH.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLU.L
SXLU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SXLU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

WTCH.AS
WTCH.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
WTCH.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLU.L vs. WTCH.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) and SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXLU.LWTCH.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.40

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

3.09

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.03

9.53

-7.51

SXLU.L vs. WTCH.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the WTCH.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLU.L and WTCH.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXLU.LWTCH.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

2.48

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.90

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

1.10

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.13

-0.60

Drawdowns

SXLU.L vs. WTCH.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLU.L drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, roughly equal to the maximum WTCH.AS drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLU.L and WTCH.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXLU.LWTCH.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-36.03%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-16.32%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.41%

-26.58%

+8.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-36.03%

+9.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

-36.03%

-0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.93%

-2.61%

-6.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-6.39%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

5.33%

-1.11%

Volatility

SXLU.L vs. WTCH.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) is 4.96%, while SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that SXLU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTCH.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXLU.LWTCH.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

7.13%

-2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.51%

15.34%

-3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

20.38%

-6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

23.29%

-6.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

21.79%

-3.78%

SXLU.L vs. WTCH.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WTCH.AS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SXLU.L vs. WTCH.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLU.L nor WTCH.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXLU.L and WTCH.AS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXLU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WTCH.AS.

SXLU.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while WTCH.AS is Technology Equities. SXLU.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while WTCH.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLU.L and 0.30% for WTCH.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXLU.L and WTCH.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer