PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXLU.L vs. UTIL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXLU.L vs. UTIL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXLU.L is traded in USD, while UTIL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UTIL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXLU.L achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than UTIL.L's 11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SXLU.L has underperformed UTIL.L with an annualized return of 8.49%, while UTIL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.94% annualized return.


SXLU.L

1D
-2.18%
1M
-6.82%
YTD
1.45%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
8.59%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
8.49%

UTIL.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
-3.74%
YTD
11.70%
6M
13.75%
1Y
28.93%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLU.L vs. UTIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXLU.L
SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF
1.45%15.70%22.97%-8.14%2.07%18.45%-1.27%25.13%2.96%10.96%
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
11.68%51.98%-4.93%16.67%-12.37%0.89%21.72%26.81%-1.47%24.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLU.L and UTIL.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015

0.47

The correlation between SXLU.L and UTIL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

SXLU.L vs. UTIL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SXLU.L
UTIL.L

Utilities

100.0%
95.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

4.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

SXLU.L
100.0%
UTIL.L
95.4%

Basic Materials

SXLU.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Communication Services

SXLU.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SXLU.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SXLU.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Energy

SXLU.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Financial Services

SXLU.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Healthcare

SXLU.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Industrials

SXLU.L

-

UTIL.L
4.6%

Real Estate

SXLU.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Technology

SXLU.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXLU.L vs. UTIL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLU.L
SXLU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SXLU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

UTIL.L
UTIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLU.L vs. UTIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXLU.LUTIL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.31

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

3.21

-2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.03

9.14

-7.11

SXLU.L vs. UTIL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLU.L and UTIL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXLU.LUTIL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

1.73

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.57

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.56

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.43

+0.10

Drawdowns

SXLU.L vs. UTIL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLU.L drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, roughly equal to the maximum UTIL.L drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLU.L and UTIL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXLU.LUTIL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-35.43%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-8.98%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.41%

-17.76%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-33.85%

+7.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

-35.43%

-0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.93%

-5.93%

-3.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-8.25%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

3.16%

+1.06%

Volatility

SXLU.L vs. UTIL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) is 4.96%, while SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that SXLU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTIL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXLU.LUTIL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

6.41%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.51%

14.01%

-2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

16.66%

-2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

19.08%

-2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

19.63%

-1.62%

SXLU.L vs. UTIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UTIL.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXLU.L vs. UTIL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLU.L nor UTIL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXLU.L and UTIL.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXLU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UTIL.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLU.L and 0.18% for UTIL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXLU.L and UTIL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer