PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXLP.L vs. XS3R.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXLP.L vs. XS3R.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Staples ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS3R.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXLP.L is traded in USD, while XS3R.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XS3R.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXLP.L achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly higher than XS3R.L's -2.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SXLP.L has outperformed XS3R.L with an annualized return of 7.10%, while XS3R.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.98% annualized return.


SXLP.L

1D
1.36%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
6.25%
6M
5.40%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
7.10%

XS3R.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
-2.97%
6M
-2.53%
1Y
-5.96%
3Y*
-2.80%
5Y*
-3.71%
10Y*
1.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLP.L vs. XS3R.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXLP.L
SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF
6.25%2.99%13.10%-1.70%-0.20%16.85%8.74%26.97%-8.84%12.07%
XS3R.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Staples ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
-2.97%11.28%-14.45%4.60%-15.52%11.97%2.49%26.30%-11.28%28.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLP.L and XS3R.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015

0.53

The correlation between SXLP.L and XS3R.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

SXLP.L vs. XS3R.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SXLP.L
XS3R.L

Consumer Defensive

99.0%
97.9%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
2.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

SXLP.L
99.0%
XS3R.L
97.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SXLP.L
1.0%
XS3R.L
2.1%

Basic Materials

SXLP.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Communication Services

SXLP.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Energy

SXLP.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Financial Services

SXLP.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Healthcare

SXLP.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Industrials

SXLP.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Real Estate

SXLP.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Technology

SXLP.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Utilities

SXLP.L

-

XS3R.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXLP.L vs. XS3R.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLP.L
SXLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SXLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

XS3R.L
XS3R.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
XS3R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS3R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS3R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
XS3R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS3R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLP.L vs. XS3R.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Staples ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS3R.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXLP.LXS3R.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.95

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

-0.33

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.63

-0.74

+1.37

SXLP.L vs. XS3R.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the XS3R.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLP.L and XS3R.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXLP.LXS3R.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

-0.36

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

-0.23

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.12

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.48

+0.07

Drawdowns

SXLP.L vs. XS3R.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum XS3R.L drawdown of -31.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLP.L and XS3R.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXLP.LXS3R.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-31.85%

+7.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-18.03%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.93%

-22.69%

+9.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

-28.89%

+11.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.00%

-31.85%

+7.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.20%

-19.23%

+11.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-8.32%

+4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

8.00%

-3.60%

Volatility

SXLP.L vs. XS3R.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) is 5.78%, while Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Staples ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS3R.L) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that SXLP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XS3R.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXLP.LXS3R.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

6.44%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

13.38%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

16.57%

-2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.20%

16.37%

-3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.53%

16.04%

-2.51%

SXLP.L vs. XS3R.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XS3R.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXLP.L vs. XS3R.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLP.L nor XS3R.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXLP.L and XS3R.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXLP.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLP.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XS3R.L.

Both ETFs track Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLP.L and 0.20% for XS3R.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXLP.L and XS3R.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer