SXLP.L vs. XLYS.L
SXLP.L (SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF) and XLYS.L (Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - SXLP.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while XLYS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Consumer Discretionary Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SXLP.L returned 7.08%/yr vs 12.84%/yr for XLYS.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SXLP.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLYS.L.
Performance
SXLP.L vs. XLYS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXLP.L achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly higher than XLYS.L's -2.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SXLP.L has underperformed XLYS.L with an annualized return of 7.08%, while XLYS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.84% annualized return.
SXLP.L
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 2.27%
- 3Y*
- 7.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 7.08%
XLYS.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- -2.85%
- 6M
- -1.25%
- 1Y
- 9.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
SXLP.L vs. XLYS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLP.L SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF | 6.42% | 2.99% | 13.10% | -1.70% | -0.20% | 16.85% | 8.74% | 26.97% | -8.84% | 12.07% |
XLYS.L Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | -2.85% | 7.65% | 28.46% | 39.95% | -33.91% | 28.81% | 26.41% | 28.22% | 0.45% | 22.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLP.L and XLYS.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SXLP.L and XLYS.L has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SXLP.L vs. XLYS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLP.L
XLYS.L
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
SXLP.L
XLYS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SXLP.L
XLYS.L
Basic Materials
SXLP.L
-
XLYS.L
-
Communication Services
SXLP.L
-
XLYS.L
-
Energy
SXLP.L
-
XLYS.L
-
Financial Services
SXLP.L
-
XLYS.L
-
Healthcare
SXLP.L
-
XLYS.L
-
Industrials
SXLP.L
-
XLYS.L
Real Estate
SXLP.L
-
XLYS.L
-
Technology
SXLP.L
-
XLYS.L
Utilities
SXLP.L
-
XLYS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLP.L vs. XLYS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLP.L
XLYS.L
SXLP.L vs. XLYS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLYS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLP.L | XLYS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.10 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 0.69 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.51 | 2.03 | -1.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLP.L | XLYS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 0.55 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.38 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.61 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.84 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
SXLP.L vs. XLYS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum XLYS.L drawdown of -37.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLP.L and XLYS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLP.L | XLYS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.00% | -37.47% | +13.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -13.87% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.93% | -26.13% | +13.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.93% | -37.47% | +20.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.00% | -37.47% | +13.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.06% | -6.23% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -6.87% | +2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.43% | 4.74% | -0.31% |
Volatility
SXLP.L vs. XLYS.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and Invesco Consumer Discretionary S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLYS.L) have volatilities of 5.67% and 5.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLP.L | XLYS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 5.67% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | 13.56% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.72% | 17.56% | -3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 22.31% | -9.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.53% | 20.89% | -7.36% |
SXLP.L vs. XLYS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLYS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SXLP.L vs. XLYS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXLP.L nor XLYS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SXLP.L and XLYS.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLYS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLYS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXLP.L.
SXLP.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while XLYS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Consumer Discretionary Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLP.L and 0.14% for XLYS.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLP.L and XLYS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer