PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXLP.L vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXLP.L vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXLP.L achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SXLP.L has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 7.10%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.


SXLP.L

1D
1.36%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
6.25%
6M
5.40%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
7.10%

GLD

1D
-0.99%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
2.92%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
31.09%
5Y*
18.15%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLP.L vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXLP.L
SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF
6.25%2.99%13.10%-1.70%-0.20%16.85%8.74%26.97%-8.84%12.07%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
2.92%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLP.L and GLD is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015

0.03

SXLP.L vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SXLP.L
GLD

Consumer Defensive

99.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

SXLP.L
99.0%
GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

SXLP.L
1.0%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

SXLP.L

-

GLD
100.0%

Communication Services

SXLP.L

-

GLD

-

Energy

SXLP.L

-

GLD

-

Financial Services

SXLP.L

-

GLD

-

Healthcare

SXLP.L

-

GLD

-

Industrials

SXLP.L

-

GLD

-

Real Estate

SXLP.L

-

GLD

-

Technology

SXLP.L

-

GLD

-

Utilities

SXLP.L

-

GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXLP.L vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLP.L
SXLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SXLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLP.L vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXLP.LGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.24

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

1.68

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.63

4.15

-3.53

SXLP.L vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLP.L and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXLP.LGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

1.21

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

1.01

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.83

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.60

-0.05

Drawdowns

SXLP.L vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLP.L and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXLP.LGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-45.56%

+21.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-19.21%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.93%

-19.21%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

-21.03%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.00%

-22.00%

-2.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.20%

-17.75%

+9.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-16.16%

+11.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

7.73%

-3.33%

Volatility

SXLP.L vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) have volatilities of 5.78% and 5.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXLP.LGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

5.51%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

23.16%

-11.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

26.61%

-12.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.20%

18.00%

-4.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.53%

15.95%

-2.42%

SXLP.L vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SXLP.L vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLP.L nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXLP.L and GLD have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXLP.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLP.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

SXLP.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while GLD is Gold. SXLP.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLP.L and 0.40% for GLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXLP.L and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer