SXLP.L vs. ESIS.L
SXLP.L (SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF) and ESIS.L (iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, from State Street and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SXLP.L returned 5.72%/yr vs -0.15%/yr for ESIS.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SXLP.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIS.L.
Performance
SXLP.L vs. ESIS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SXLP.L is traded in USD, while ESIS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXLP.L achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly higher than ESIS.L's -2.61% return.
SXLP.L
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- 6.25%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
ESIS.L
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -2.66%
- YTD
- -2.61%
- 6M
- -2.05%
- 1Y
- -1.95%
- 3Y*
- 2.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- —
SXLP.L vs. ESIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLP.L SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF | 6.25% | 2.99% | 13.10% | -1.70% | -0.20% | 16.85% | 1.66% |
ESIS.L iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | -2.61% | 20.61% | -8.31% | 4.19% | -13.32% | 11.20% | 5.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLP.L and ESIS.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020 | 0.54 |
The correlation between SXLP.L and ESIS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
SXLP.L vs. ESIS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLP.L
ESIS.L
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
SXLP.L
ESIS.L
Consumer Cyclical
SXLP.L
ESIS.L
Basic Materials
SXLP.L
-
ESIS.L
-
Communication Services
SXLP.L
-
ESIS.L
-
Energy
SXLP.L
-
ESIS.L
-
Financial Services
SXLP.L
-
ESIS.L
-
Healthcare
SXLP.L
-
ESIS.L
-
Industrials
SXLP.L
-
ESIS.L
-
Real Estate
SXLP.L
-
ESIS.L
-
Technology
SXLP.L
-
ESIS.L
-
Utilities
SXLP.L
-
ESIS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLP.L vs. ESIS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLP.L
ESIS.L
SXLP.L vs. ESIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLP.L | ESIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.99 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | -0.13 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | -0.31 | +0.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLP.L | ESIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | -0.13 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | -0.01 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.16 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
SXLP.L vs. ESIS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum ESIS.L drawdown of -25.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLP.L and ESIS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLP.L | ESIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.00% | -25.47% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -14.45% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.93% | -16.37% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.93% | -25.47% | +8.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.20% | -12.76% | +4.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -9.03% | +4.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 6.24% | -1.84% |
Volatility
SXLP.L vs. ESIS.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIS.L) at 4.98%. This indicates that SXLP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLP.L | ESIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.78% | 4.98% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | 11.65% | -0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.72% | 14.52% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 15.03% | -1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.53% | 14.81% | -1.28% |
SXLP.L vs. ESIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIS.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SXLP.L vs. ESIS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXLP.L nor ESIS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SXLP.L and ESIS.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXLP.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLP.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIS.L.
Both ETFs track Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLP.L and 0.18% for ESIS.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLP.L and ESIS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer