PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXLP.L vs. CSTP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXLP.L vs. CSTP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXLP.L is traded in USD, while CSTP.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSTP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXLP.L achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly higher than CSTP.L's 5.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SXLP.L has outperformed CSTP.L with an annualized return of 7.09%, while CSTP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.08% annualized return.


SXLP.L

1D
1.24%
1M
1.30%
6M
5.89%
YTD
10.84%
1Y
9.49%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
7.09%

CSTP.L

1D
0.73%
1M
5.68%
6M
6.18%
YTD
5.05%
1Y
8.93%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*
4.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLP.L vs. CSTP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXLP.L
SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF
10.84%3.01%13.10%-1.70%-0.20%16.85%8.74%26.99%-8.82%12.03%
CSTP.L
State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF
5.05%21.55%-8.40%3.86%-13.42%12.05%5.32%22.26%-13.22%24.58%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLP.L and CSTP.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.57

The correlation between SXLP.L and CSTP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXLP.L vs. CSTP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLP.L
SXLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SXLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CSTP.L
CSTP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CSTP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSTP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSTP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CSTP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSTP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLP.L vs. CSTP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SXLP.LCSTP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.11

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

0.65

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.94

1.34

+0.60

SXLP.L vs. CSTP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is comparable to the CSTP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLP.L and CSTP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SXLP.L vs. CSTP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum CSTP.L drawdown of -25.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLP.L and CSTP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXLP.LCSTP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-25.90%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-13.79%

+4.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.92%

-16.50%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

-24.76%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.00%

-25.90%

+1.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.22%

-5.30%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-6.88%

+2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.87%

6.63%

-1.76%

Volatility

SXLP.L vs. CSTP.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L) at 5.08%. This indicates that SXLP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSTP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXLP.LCSTP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

5.08%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.01%

12.24%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

14.99%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.42%

15.13%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.60%

14.78%

-1.18%

SXLP.L vs. CSTP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CSTP.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXLP.L vs. CSTP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLP.L nor CSTP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXLP.L and CSTP.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXLP.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLP.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CSTP.L.

SXLP.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while CSTP.L tracks MSCI Europe Consumer Staples 35/20 Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLP.L and 0.18% for CSTP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXLP.L and CSTP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer