SXLI.L vs. XLBS.L
SXLI.L (SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF) and XLBS.L (Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Industrials Equities funds - SXLI.L tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD while XLBS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SXLI.L returned 13.67%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for XLBS.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SXLI.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLBS.L.
Performance
SXLI.L vs. XLBS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SXLI.L having a 12.58% return and XLBS.L slightly lower at 12.49%. Over the past 10 years, SXLI.L has outperformed XLBS.L with an annualized return of 13.67%, while XLBS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.85% annualized return.
SXLI.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 12.58%
- 6M
- 13.76%
- 1Y
- 23.16%
- 3Y*
- 21.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
XLBS.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 12.49%
- 6M
- 16.60%
- 1Y
- 18.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
SXLI.L vs. XLBS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLI.L SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF | 12.58% | 19.21% | 17.42% | 17.94% | -5.33% | 20.69% | 10.13% | 28.61% | -14.01% | 23.49% |
XLBS.L Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 12.49% | 11.15% | -0.84% | 12.27% | -12.07% | 27.01% | 20.06% | 23.52% | -15.00% | 23.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLI.L and XLBS.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SXLI.L and XLBS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SXLI.L vs. XLBS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLI.L
XLBS.L
Industrials
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
SXLI.L
XLBS.L
Technology
SXLI.L
XLBS.L
-
Utilities
SXLI.L
XLBS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SXLI.L
XLBS.L
Basic Materials
SXLI.L
XLBS.L
Communication Services
SXLI.L
-
XLBS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SXLI.L
-
XLBS.L
-
Energy
SXLI.L
-
XLBS.L
-
Financial Services
SXLI.L
-
XLBS.L
-
Healthcare
SXLI.L
-
XLBS.L
-
Real Estate
SXLI.L
-
XLBS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLI.L vs. XLBS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLI.L
XLBS.L
SXLI.L vs. XLBS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLI.L) and Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLI.L | XLBS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.20 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.60 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.52 | 4.81 | +3.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLI.L | XLBS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.14 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.26 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.50 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.50 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
SXLI.L vs. XLBS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLI.L drawdown since its inception was -42.17%, which is greater than XLBS.L's maximum drawdown of -35.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLI.L and XLBS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLI.L | XLBS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.17% | -35.84% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.44% | -11.68% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -23.04% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.24% | -25.27% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.17% | -35.84% | -6.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -3.56% | +2.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -6.80% | +2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 3.89% | -1.18% |
Volatility
SXLI.L vs. XLBS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLI.L) is 5.08%, while Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that SXLI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLBS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLI.L | XLBS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 6.17% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.78% | 13.30% | -1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.60% | 16.51% | -1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 18.91% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 19.52% | -0.42% |
SXLI.L vs. XLBS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLI.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLBS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SXLI.L vs. XLBS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXLI.L nor XLBS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SXLI.L and XLBS.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLBS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLBS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXLI.L.
SXLI.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XLBS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLI.L and 0.14% for XLBS.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLI.L and XLBS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer