SXLE.L vs. XDW0.L
SXLE.L (State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF) and XDW0.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) are both Energy Equities funds - SXLE.L tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index while XDW0.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SXLE.L returned 9.59%/yr vs 9.43%/yr for XDW0.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SXLE.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDW0.L.
Performance
SXLE.L vs. XDW0.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SXLE.L having a 30.51% return and XDW0.L slightly higher at 30.91%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SXLE.L having a 9.59% annualized return and XDW0.L not far behind at 9.43%.
SXLE.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 30.51%
- 6M
- 29.43%
- 1Y
- 46.36%
- 3Y*
- 17.26%
- 5Y*
- 20.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
XDW0.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 30.91%
- 6M
- 28.80%
- 1Y
- 47.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 19.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
SXLE.L vs. XDW0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLE.L State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 30.51% | 9.74% | 3.75% | 0.62% | 62.75% | 50.77% | -31.89% | 9.19% | -18.13% | -1.18% |
XDW0.L Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 30.91% | 14.66% | 2.10% | 3.69% | 46.28% | 39.22% | -30.39% | 10.05% | -15.68% | 5.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLE.L and XDW0.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016 | 0.96 |
The correlation between SXLE.L and XDW0.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SXLE.L vs. XDW0.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLE.L
XDW0.L
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
SXLE.L
XDW0.L
Basic Materials
SXLE.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Communication Services
SXLE.L
-
XDW0.L
Consumer Cyclical
SXLE.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SXLE.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Financial Services
SXLE.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Healthcare
SXLE.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Industrials
SXLE.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Real Estate
SXLE.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Technology
SXLE.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Utilities
SXLE.L
-
XDW0.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLE.L vs. XDW0.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLE.L
XDW0.L
SXLE.L vs. XDW0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLE.L | XDW0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 3.89 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.94 | 12.98 | -3.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLE.L | XDW0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.46 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.79 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.36 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.39 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
SXLE.L vs. XDW0.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLE.L drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, roughly equal to the maximum XDW0.L drawdown of -63.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLE.L and XDW0.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLE.L | XDW0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.60% | -63.72% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.55% | -12.14% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -18.90% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.87% | -26.47% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.60% | -63.72% | -2.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.44% | -6.03% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.96% | -12.31% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 3.64% | +1.01% |
Volatility
SXLE.L vs. XDW0.L - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) at 7.38%. This indicates that SXLE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDW0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLE.L | XDW0.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 7.38% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.52% | 16.33% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.87% | 19.23% | +2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.65% | 24.24% | +2.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.66% | 26.16% | +2.50% |
SXLE.L vs. XDW0.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDW0.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SXLE.L vs. XDW0.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXLE.L nor XDW0.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, SXLE.L and XDW0.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SXLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.L.
SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while XDW0.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLE.L and 0.25% for XDW0.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLE.L and XDW0.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer