PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXLE.L vs. SPYL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXLE.L vs. SPYL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXLE.L achieves a 30.51% return, which is significantly higher than SPYL.L's 10.35% return.


SXLE.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
30.51%
6M
29.43%
1Y
46.36%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
20.21%
10Y*
9.59%

SPYL.L

1D
0.02%
1M
4.53%
YTD
10.35%
6M
11.11%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLE.L vs. SPYL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SXLE.L
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF
30.51%9.74%3.75%0.13%
SPYL.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.35%17.39%25.33%14.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLE.L and SPYL.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023

0.16

The correlation between SXLE.L and SPYL.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SXLE.L vs. SPYL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SXLE.L
SPYL.L

Energy

100.0%
3.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Energy

SXLE.L
100.0%
SPYL.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

SXLE.L

-

SPYL.L
1.8%

Communication Services

SXLE.L

-

SPYL.L
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SXLE.L

-

SPYL.L
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

SXLE.L

-

SPYL.L
4.9%

Financial Services

SXLE.L

-

SPYL.L
11.8%

Healthcare

SXLE.L

-

SPYL.L
8.5%

Industrials

SXLE.L

-

SPYL.L
8.3%

Real Estate

SXLE.L

-

SPYL.L
1.9%

Technology

SXLE.L

-

SPYL.L
35.6%

Utilities

SXLE.L

-

SPYL.L
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXLE.L vs. SPYL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLE.L
SXLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYL.L
SPYL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLE.L vs. SPYL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXLE.LSPYL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.37

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.94

14.52

-4.57

SXLE.L vs. SPYL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLE.L and SPYL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXLE.LSPYL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.36

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

1.91

-1.56

Drawdowns

SXLE.L vs. SPYL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLE.L drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, which is greater than SPYL.L's maximum drawdown of -18.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLE.L and SPYL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXLE.LSPYL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.60%

-18.42%

-48.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.55%

-8.13%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.44%

-0.52%

-6.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.96%

-1.76%

-12.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

1.90%

+2.75%

Volatility

SXLE.L vs. SPYL.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) at 3.12%. This indicates that SXLE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXLE.LSPYL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

3.12%

+5.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.52%

8.61%

+9.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.87%

11.59%

+10.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.65%

13.96%

+12.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.66%

13.96%

+14.70%

SXLE.L vs. SPYL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXLE.L vs. SPYL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLE.L nor SPYL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXLE.L and SPYL.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYL.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYL.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXLE.L.

SXLE.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPYL.L is S&P 500. SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while SPYL.L tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLE.L and 0.03% for SPYL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXLE.L and SPYL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer