SXLE.L vs. ENGW.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SXLE.L (State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF) and ENGW.L (SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds from State Street - SXLE.L tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index while ENGW.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SXLE.L returned 17.39%/yr vs 19.00%/yr for ENGW.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SXLE.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ENGW.L.

Performance

SXLE.L vs. ENGW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SXLE.L is traded in USD, while ENGW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ENGW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SXLE.L having a 30.88% return and ENGW.L slightly higher at 31.17%.

SXLE.L

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 30.88%
• 6M: 30.35%
• 1Y: 44.50%
• 3Y*: 17.39%
• 5Y*: 20.28%
• 10Y*: 9.89%

ENGW.L

• 1D: 1.97%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 31.17%
• 6M: 30.11%
• 1Y: 46.46%
• 3Y*: 19.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLE.L vs. ENGW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SXLE.L State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF	30.88%	9.74%	3.75%	0.62%	16.04%
ENGW.L SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF	31.17%	15.28%	1.82%	3.10%	11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLE.L and ENGW.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022	0.94

The correlation between SXLE.L and ENGW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SXLE.L vs. ENGW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLE.L

SXLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SXLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SXLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SXLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SXLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

ENGW.L

ENGW.L Risk / Return Rank: 63
ENGW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ENGW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ENGW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ENGW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ENGW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLE.L vs. ENGW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SXLE.L	ENGW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	2.25	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	2.81	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.39	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	3.71	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.59	12.85	-3.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SXLE.L vs. ENGW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the ENGW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLE.L and ENGW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SXLE.L	ENGW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	2.25	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.62	-0.27

Drawdowns

SXLE.L vs. ENGW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLE.L drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, which is greater than ENGW.L's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLE.L and ENGW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SXLE.L	ENGW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.60%	-26.08%	-40.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.55%	-12.46%	-2.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.90%	-18.79%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.18%	-5.41%	-1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.97%	-5.95%	-8.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.63%	3.60%	+1.03%

Volatility

SXLE.L vs. ENGW.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) at 7.73%. This indicates that SXLE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENGW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SXLE.L	ENGW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.19%	7.73%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.52%	17.64%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.95%	20.56%	+1.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.65%	23.71%	+2.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.66%	23.71%	+4.95%

SXLE.L vs. ENGW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ENGW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SXLE.L vs. ENGW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLE.L nor ENGW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SXLE.L and ENGW.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, SXLE.L and ENGW.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, SXLE.L or ENGW.L?

On fees, SXLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SXLE.L or ENGW.L?

SXLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ENGW.L.

What is the main difference between SXLE.L and ENGW.L?

SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while ENGW.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLE.L and 0.30% for ENGW.L.