SXLB.L vs. SWLD.L
SXLB.L (SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF) and SWLD.L (SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SXLB.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while SWLD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SXLB.L returned 5.02%/yr vs 11.98%/yr for SWLD.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SXLB.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SWLD.L.
Performance
SXLB.L vs. SWLD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SXLB.L is traded in USD, while SWLD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SWLD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXLB.L achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than SWLD.L's 9.79% return.
SXLB.L
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 16.76%
- 1Y
- 18.30%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
SWLD.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 9.79%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 26.03%
- 3Y*
- 20.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.98%
- 10Y*
- —
SXLB.L vs. SWLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLB.L SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF | 12.57% | 10.91% | -0.67% | 12.37% | -11.86% | 26.98% | 20.18% | 13.31% |
SWLD.L SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF | 9.79% | 21.37% | 19.18% | 23.91% | -17.89% | 22.54% | 15.43% | 15.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLB.L and SWLD.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2019 | 0.71 |
The correlation between SXLB.L and SWLD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SXLB.L vs. SWLD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLB.L
SWLD.L
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SXLB.L
SWLD.L
Consumer Cyclical
SXLB.L
SWLD.L
Communication Services
SXLB.L
-
SWLD.L
Consumer Defensive
SXLB.L
-
SWLD.L
Energy
SXLB.L
-
SWLD.L
Financial Services
SXLB.L
-
SWLD.L
Healthcare
SXLB.L
-
SWLD.L
Industrials
SXLB.L
-
SWLD.L
Real Estate
SXLB.L
-
SWLD.L
Technology
SXLB.L
-
SWLD.L
Utilities
SXLB.L
-
SWLD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLB.L vs. SWLD.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLB.L
SWLD.L
SXLB.L vs. SWLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLB.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLB.L | SWLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.41 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 3.02 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.74 | 13.35 | -8.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLB.L | SWLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 2.30 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.79 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.84 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
SXLB.L vs. SWLD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.00%, which is greater than SWLD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLB.L and SWLD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLB.L | SWLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.00% | -33.63% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -8.58% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.63% | -17.65% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.19% | -26.17% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -0.50% | -2.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -5.02% | -1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 1.95% | +1.90% |
Volatility
SXLB.L vs. SWLD.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLB.L) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWLD.L) at 2.75%. This indicates that SXLB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLB.L | SWLD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 2.75% | +3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.37% | 8.48% | +4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49% | 11.27% | +5.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 15.23% | +3.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 17.07% | +2.51% |
SXLB.L vs. SWLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLB.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SXLB.L vs. SWLD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXLB.L nor SWLD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SXLB.L and SWLD.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWLD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWLD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXLB.L.
SXLB.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SWLD.L is Global Equities. SXLB.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while SWLD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLB.L and 0.12% for SWLD.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLB.L and SWLD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer