SWZ vs. AMFEX
SWZ (Total Return Securities Fund) and AMFEX (AAMA Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SWZ returned 11.63%/yr vs 10.69%/yr for AMFEX. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SWZ charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for AMFEX.
Performance
SWZ vs. AMFEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWZ achieves a -5.14% return, which is significantly lower than AMFEX's 13.57% return.
SWZ
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- -5.14%
- 1Y
- -1.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.33%
AMFEX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- YTD
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 24.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $177.26K | $207.26K | $377.27K |
SWZ vs. AMFEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWZ Total Return Securities Fund | -5.14% | 86.85% | -2.46% | 15.50% | -17.69% | 18.20% | 14.19% | 24.00% | -11.65% |
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund | 13.57% | 17.33% | 16.28% | 17.32% | -14.08% | 22.58% | 12.70% | 24.62% | -9.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWZ and AMFEX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWZ vs. AMFEX — Risk / Return Rank
SWZ
AMFEX
SWZ vs. AMFEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Total Return Securities Fund (SWZ) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWZ | AMFEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.39 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 3.69 | -4.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 15.37 | -16.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWZ vs. AMFEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWZ drawdown since its inception was -69.62%, which is greater than AMFEX's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWZ and AMFEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWZ | AMFEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.62% | -30.41% | -39.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -6.07% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.47% | -15.23% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.36% | -21.21% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.10% | -0.42% | -7.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.91% | -4.24% | -17.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 1.46% | +2.57% |
Volatility
SWZ vs. AMFEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Total Return Securities Fund (SWZ) is 1.78%, while AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX) has a volatility of 2.37%. This indicates that SWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMFEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWZ | AMFEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 2.37% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.56% | 7.74% | -1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.22% | 10.10% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.21% | 14.22% | +12.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 16.84% | +5.86% |
SWZ vs. AMFEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWZ has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFEX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWZ vs. AMFEX - Dividend Comparison
SWZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMFEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMFEX AAMA Equity Fund | 10.56% | 11.99% | 9.19% | 0.92% | 4.82% | 0.22% | 0.44% | 0.78% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWZ Total Return Securities Fund | 0.00% | 98.81% | 7.11% | 6.07% | 8.23% | 5.83% | 6.25% | 1.67% | 74.09% | 1.02% | 5.00% | 6.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWZ and AMFEX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMFEX has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to SWZ (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWZ dropped -69.62% vs AMFEX's -30.41%.
AMFEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWZ and AMFEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer