SWYOX vs. SFLNX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SWYOX (Schwab Target 2065 Index Fund) and SFLNX (Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SWYOX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Charles Schwab, while SFLNX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI US Large Company Index. Over the past 5 years, SWYOX returned 10.56%/yr vs 12.81%/yr for SFLNX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWYOX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SFLNX.

Performance

SWYOX vs. SFLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2065 Index Fund (SWYOX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWYOX achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly lower than SFLNX's 14.13% return.

SWYOX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 12.72%
• 6M: 13.88%
• 1Y: 28.92%
• 3Y*: 20.09%
• 5Y*: 10.56%
• 10Y*: —

SFLNX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 2.92%
• YTD: 14.13%
• 6M: 14.98%
• 1Y: 32.64%
• 3Y*: 20.74%
• 5Y*: 12.81%
• 10Y*: 14.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWYOX vs. SFLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SWYOX Schwab Target 2065 Index Fund	12.72%	20.48%	14.95%	21.61%	-17.90%	16.04%
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund	14.13%	17.02%	16.78%	18.16%	-6.89%	17.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SWYOX and SFLNX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021	0.90

The correlation between SWYOX and SFLNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWYOX vs. SFLNX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SWYOX	SFLNX
Technology	26.8%	19.0%
Financial Services	15.4%	13.9%
Industrials	11.3%	9.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	9.2%
Healthcare	7.8%	11.9%
Communication Services	7.5%	10.3%
Real Estate	7.3%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	7.4%
Energy	4.1%	10.2%
Basic Materials	3.8%	3.7%
Utilities	2.5%	3.2%

Return for Risk

SWYOX vs. SFLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWYOX

SWYOX Risk / Return Rank: 70
SWYOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SWYOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SWYOX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
SWYOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SWYOX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

SFLNX

SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 92
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWYOX vs. SFLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2065 Index Fund (SWYOX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWYOX	SFLNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	3.19	-0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	4.45	-1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.59	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	5.40	-2.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.46	21.23	-6.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWYOX vs. SFLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWYOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the SFLNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWYOX and SFLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWYOX	SFLNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	3.19	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.84	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.53	+0.25

Drawdowns

SWYOX vs. SFLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWYOX drawdown since its inception was -26.02%, smaller than the maximum SFLNX drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYOX and SFLNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWYOX	SFLNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.02%	-56.18%	+30.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.13%	-6.10%	-3.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.05%	-16.27%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.02%	-18.98%	-7.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.30%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-6.01%	+0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	1.55%	+0.49%

Volatility

SWYOX vs. SFLNX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2065 Index Fund (SWYOX) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) at 2.47%. This indicates that SWYOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWYOX	SFLNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.62%	2.47%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.61%	7.45%	+2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.13%	10.37%	+1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.58%	15.26%	+0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.44%	18.40%	-2.96%

SWYOX vs. SFLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWYOX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLNX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SWYOX vs. SFLNX - Dividend Comparison

SWYOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than SFLNX's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund	1.47%	1.68%	1.78%	1.86%	2.09%	4.78%	6.17%	5.33%	9.69%	3.28%	7.23%	5.68%
SWYOX Schwab Target 2065 Index Fund	1.66%	1.87%	1.76%	1.82%	1.80%	1.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWYOX and SFLNX in my portfolio?

SWYOX and SFLNX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWYOX or SFLNX?

SWYOX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to SFLNX (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYOX dropped -26.02% vs SFLNX's -56.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.