PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWYGX vs. VITSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWYGX vs. VITSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWYGX achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly lower than VITSX's 11.14% return.


SWYGX

1D
-0.58%
1M
2.89%
YTD
9.73%
6M
10.08%
1Y
22.70%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*

VITSX

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.07%
YTD
11.14%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.11%
3Y*
22.05%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWYGX vs. VITSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWYGX
Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund
9.73%17.57%12.83%19.45%-16.94%15.68%14.19%23.63%-6.62%19.12%
VITSX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares
11.14%17.14%23.25%26.51%-19.51%25.74%20.99%30.80%-5.18%21.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SWYGX and VITSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2016

0.96

The correlation between SWYGX and VITSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWYGX vs. VITSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWYGX
VITSX

Technology

27.1%
33.3%

Financial Services

15.0%
11.9%

Industrials

11.2%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
9.8%

Healthcare

7.8%
9.1%

Communication Services

7.7%
10.1%

Real Estate

7.6%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.7%

Energy

4.0%
3.8%

Basic Materials

3.6%
2.0%

Utilities

2.5%
2.7%

Technology

SWYGX
27.1%
VITSX
33.3%

Financial Services

SWYGX
15.0%
VITSX
11.9%

Industrials

SWYGX
11.2%
VITSX
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SWYGX
8.9%
VITSX
9.8%

Healthcare

SWYGX
7.8%
VITSX
9.1%

Communication Services

SWYGX
7.7%
VITSX
10.1%

Real Estate

SWYGX
7.6%
VITSX
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

SWYGX
4.6%
VITSX
4.7%

Energy

SWYGX
4.0%
VITSX
3.8%

Basic Materials

SWYGX
3.6%
VITSX
2.0%

Utilities

SWYGX
2.5%
VITSX
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWYGX vs. VITSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWYGX
SWYGX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SWYGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VITSX
VITSX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VITSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VITSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWYGX vs. VITSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWYGXVITSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.42

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.17

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.78

14.62

-0.84

SWYGX vs. VITSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWYGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the VITSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWYGX and VITSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWYGXVITSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.32

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.73

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.49

+0.27

Drawdowns

SWYGX vs. VITSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWYGX drawdown since its inception was -27.62%, smaller than the maximum VITSX drawdown of -55.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYGX and VITSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWYGXVITSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.62%

-55.30%

+27.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

-8.92%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.96%

-19.36%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-25.36%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.76%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-10.07%

+5.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.93%

-0.26%

Volatility

SWYGX vs. VITSX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITSX) have volatilities of 3.07% and 3.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWYGXVITSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

3.05%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

9.20%

-1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

12.22%

-2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.18%

17.36%

-4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.02%

18.41%

-4.39%

SWYGX vs. VITSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWYGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VITSX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWYGX vs. VITSX - Dividend Comparison

SWYGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than VITSX's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWYGX
Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund
2.03%2.23%2.28%2.06%2.03%1.80%1.72%1.95%2.21%1.44%1.13%0.00%
VITSX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.43%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.77%2.04%1.71%1.93%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SWYGX and VITSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWYGX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to VITSX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYGX dropped -27.62% vs VITSX's -55.30%.

SWYGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWYGX and VITSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer