SWSBX vs. DFCFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX) and DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX).
SWSBX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government/Credit 1-5 Year Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2017. DFCFX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Jun 6, 1996.
Performance
SWSBX vs. DFCFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWSBX vs. DFCFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWSBX Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund | -0.16% | 6.06% | 3.42% | 3.95% | -5.89% | -1.28% | 4.47% | 4.96% | 1.34% | 0.85% |
DFCFX DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio | 0.89% | 2.28% | 5.33% | 4.92% | -3.28% | 8.60% | 0.57% | 2.65% | 1.78% | 0.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWSBX achieves a -0.16% return, which is significantly lower than DFCFX's 0.89% return.
SWSBX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 3.74%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.27%
- 10Y*
- —
DFCFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 2.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWSBX vs. DFCFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWSBX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than DFCFX's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SWSBX vs. DFCFX — Risk / Return Rank
SWSBX
DFCFX
SWSBX vs. DFCFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX) and DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWSBX | DFCFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.59 | 2.59 | -1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.60 | 2.98 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 3.80 | -2.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 2.07 | +0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.85 | 5.56 | +4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWSBX | DFCFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 2.59 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.84 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.34 | -0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWSBX and DFCFX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SWSBX vs. DFCFX - Dividend Comparison
SWSBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than DFCFX's 2.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWSBX Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 3.79% | 4.09% | 3.66% | 2.36% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 1.82% | 2.41% | 2.12% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFCFX DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio | 2.94% | 2.16% | 4.90% | 3.43% | 1.32% | 8.29% | 0.67% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 0.53% |
Drawdowns
SWSBX vs. DFCFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWSBX drawdown since its inception was -9.06%, which is greater than DFCFX's maximum drawdown of -4.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWSBX and DFCFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWSBX | DFCFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.06% | -4.27% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.54% | -1.03% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.06% | -4.27% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | 0.00% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.81% | -0.26% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.42% | 0.38% | +0.04% |
Volatility
SWSBX vs. DFCFX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to DFA Two-Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFCFX) at 0.15%. This indicates that SWSBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFCFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWSBX | DFCFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 0.15% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.49% | 0.42% | +1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40% | 1.21% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.95% | 4.39% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.47% | 3.13% | -0.66% |