SWRD.L vs. VUAA.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SWRD.L (SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF) and VUAA.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - SWRD.L is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while VUAA.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Net Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWRD.L returned 11.96%/yr vs 13.71%/yr for VUAA.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SWRD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VUAA.L.

Performance

SWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWRD.L achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than VUAA.L's 10.32% return.

SWRD.L

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 3.81%
• YTD: 9.82%
• 6M: 11.31%
• 1Y: 26.51%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 11.96%
• 10Y*: —

VUAA.L

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 4.46%
• YTD: 10.32%
• 6M: 11.14%
• 1Y: 28.28%
• 3Y*: 22.30%
• 5Y*: 13.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SWRD.L SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF	9.82%	21.09%	19.26%	24.41%	-17.81%	22.11%	15.89%	11.61%
VUAA.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	10.32%	17.37%	25.27%	26.68%	-18.63%	29.34%	17.66%	12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SWRD.L and VUAA.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019	0.97

The correlation between SWRD.L and VUAA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SWRD.L	VUAA.L
Technology	28.3%	35.7%
Financial Services	15.7%	11.6%
Industrials	11.4%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	10.2%
Communication Services	9.2%	11.3%
Healthcare	8.8%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	4.9%
Energy	4.2%	3.5%
Basic Materials	3.3%	1.8%
Utilities	2.7%	2.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

SWRD.L vs. VUAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWRD.L

SWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 67
SWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
SWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
SWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

VUAA.L

VUAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
VUAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
VUAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
VUAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
VUAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWRD.L	VUAA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	2.41	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	3.52	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.44	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	3.44	-0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.45	14.77	-1.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the VUAA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWRD.L and VUAA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWRD.L	VUAA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	2.41	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.86	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.91	-0.08

Drawdowns

SWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, roughly equal to the maximum VUAA.L drawdown of -34.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWRD.L and VUAA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWRD.L	VUAA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.10%	-34.05%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-8.18%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.89%	-18.39%	+1.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.54%	-24.36%	-1.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-0.54%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.02%	-5.10%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	1.91%	+0.06%

Volatility

SWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VUAA.L) at 3.18%. This indicates that SWRD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWRD.L	VUAA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	3.18%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.05%	8.57%	+0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.83%	11.73%	+0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.52%	16.00%	-0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.26%	17.79%	-0.53%

SWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWRD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SWRD.L vs. VUAA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWRD.L nor VUAA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWRD.L and VUAA.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, SWRD.L and VUAA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, SWRD.L or VUAA.L?

On fees, VUAA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SWRD.L or VUAA.L?

VUAA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SWRD.L.

What is the main difference between SWRD.L and VUAA.L?

SWRD.L is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VUAA.L is S&P 500. SWRD.L tracks MSCI World Index, while VUAA.L tracks S&P 500 Net Total Return. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SWRD.L and 0.07% for VUAA.L.